Best MWC 2012 phones
0. phoneArena 02 Mar 2012, 07:22 posted on
MWC 2012 has come and gone, but what's left behind it is a good number of awesome devices that we'll be looking forward to seeing again later in the year. For now, however, we decided to sit down and reminisce, trying to remember exactly which of the newly-announced phones made the biggest impression on us...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. cepcamba (Posts: 717; Member since: 27 Feb 2012)
Nice list :p I'd replace the D quad with it's bigger brother though (bigger battery).
10. cepcamba (Posts: 717; Member since: 27 Feb 2012)
Beats me :p Probably from those people who prefer slimmer droids? :) Anyway, to each his own, I'd go for a bigger battery over a slim profile anyday.
15. Bangthering_007 (Posts: 36; Member since: 21 Feb 2012)
I prefer that in women too!! BIGGER BATTERY!!
2. MalakiMills (Posts: 255; Member since: 15 Jun 2010)
You forgot to throw in the camera of the One X. That should be a pretty nice selling point for it as well as all the others.
3. remixfa (Posts: 13902; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)
your right, they didnt mention it at all even though its got its own HTC camera chip in it now and is supposed to be way better.
17. stylinred (Posts: 50; Member since: 03 Mar 2012)
if you saw the samples from the oneX by HTC bloggers you'll see why its not mentioned
they should also mention the OneX wont be Quad Core worldwide as LTE versions are stuck with DualCore
6. SleepingOz (Posts: 2483; Member since: 22 Oct 2011)
Did you read the title? It's about the BEST PHONES not the best camera on a mediocre phone.
7. -RVM- (Posts: 329; Member since: 19 Oct 2011)
I don't think these phones have better calling quality or battery performance than Nokia 808. Other features, such as quad-core CPU, high resolution display, etc. have nothing to do with phone functionality.
8. SleepingOz (Posts: 2483; Member since: 22 Oct 2011)
I may agree with you for the battery performance but for the rest, you sure don't know what you're talking about. Seriously, 360 x 640 on a 4inch screen?! But i guess you're ok with huge pixels.
If not . . well, it's time to wake up, nokia fanboy.
11. PhansMuneeb (Posts: 337; Member since: 28 Jan 2012)
Many apps for symbian are made for 360*640 resolution, so increasing them makes the apps incompatible. And its very fast and doesn't require quad cores (Android is resource hungry, not so good) and Symbian has many features. One of it is handling 41mp and 1/1.2" sensor....
Long Live Symbian.
13. bayusuputra (Posts: 941; Member since: 12 Feb 2012)
i agree with you, even with that resource hungry statement (although it may not be that hungry).. but the last statement.. uuhhmm.. not really sure about that, considering Nokia is slowly killing it..
14. SleepingOz (Posts: 2483; Member since: 22 Oct 2011)
Long Live Symbian! AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I really pity you, in denial, Nokia fanboys.
18. stylinred (Posts: 50; Member since: 03 Mar 2012)
well screen technology is more important than resolution numbers... everyone should know that by now unless they're noobs
and what about the Fragmentation inside android phones where some devices of the same model dont have the same hardware.... for instance the OneX... LTE versions wont have quad core cpus
19. stylinred (Posts: 50; Member since: 03 Mar 2012)
and the 808 has more features packed into the phone than any of those listed in this article and it performs better.. so really it should be on top of that list
shame the android fanboys are always too scared to mention great nokia devices... considering the cocky attitudes you would think they wouldn't be threatened by Nokia devices
5. GeekMovement (Posts: 1497; Member since: 09 Sep 2011)
Good List I love all of them. Wish the Acer would come out earlier though..