Apple vs Samsung closing arguments: "It took you three months to copy what we've been developing for five years"
0. phoneArena 22 Aug 2012, 08:59 posted on
The Apple and Samsung legal teams took the stage yesterday for their closing speeches, giving them one last shot to convince the ragtag jury crew, before they enter the final deliberations stage today and come up with a verdict...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. jaoowolabi (Posts: 201; Member since: 07 Jun 2012)
i hope i never have to go to court for something as stupid as this....
5. pokharkarsaga (Posts: 365; Member since: 23 Feb 2012)
The 2nd picture complete says that Samsung copied apple because the design of Samsung devices suddenly changed after launch of apple on Jan 2007.
127. Lucas777 (Posts: 2137; Member since: 06 Jan 2011)
none of the phones in picture 16 made samsung super profitable… they had to copy the iphone with the galaxy line to become the major player they are today
139. anywherehome (Posts: 971; Member since: 13 Dec 2011)
so a patent should be given to who sold it? how old are you?
33. mikiemon (Posts: 12; Member since: 01 Feb 2012)
And the 16th photo shows they were using that shape for phones a year before the Iphone came out. Like a true Ifan you see want you want see and not the truth. Apple has never done anything truly inventive on the iphone only copy and steal /buy from others. I take that back they were the first to go with a super high res screen, but then they had to because their display is so damn small.
74. tedkord (Posts: 5623; Member since: 17 Jun 2009)
That, plus the fact that we now know Sony were also working on these types of designs prior to the iPhone, and the LG Prada design was released prior to the iPhone (and in fact won an award for that design), makes it pretty clear that the design was the natural evolution of smartphones, and not a unique idea from Apple.
Now, add in the fact that the iPad is a direct copy of the Fidler tablet, and it was shown that Apple was shown the tablet a decade prior to the iPad, and it becomes clear that Apple does exactly what they claim others do -copy.
Things that existed in phones prior to the iPhone:
Rectangles with rounded corners
Grids of icons
Bottom row of fixed icons
Green phone icon for...wait for it...the phone
Swipe to unlock
And many more...
117. structureman116 (Posts: 135; Member since: 14 Sep 2010)
And they had to buy this super high res screen from someone else because they lack the capabilities to manufacture it themselves! Aren't they buying screens for their new gadgets from Sharp and LG?
144. Kalevro (Posts: 56; Member since: 11 Sep 2011)
Yes but you don't get the point. If Apple starts building their own screens it would be a pain in the ass. Therefore they use existing factories with a license and permition. It is wayyy more cheap and usefull.
145. Kalevro (Posts: 56; Member since: 11 Sep 2011)
And the technology of the screen is totally Apple LG just manufactures them. You give the product and they just copy-paste for mass production, understand. The screen isn't of any other branding than Apple
147. remixfa (Posts: 14226; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)
you couldnt be more wrong if you tried.
39. SGSatlantis (Posts: 205; Member since: 20 Jul 2011)
The blackjack looks like galaxy s predecesor with qwerty.
92. remixfa (Posts: 14226; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)
look at the entire line up, not 3 randomly chosen phones by apple to make it look like there is a copy. Samsung was using prior samsung design evolution. The shapes didnt change that much between 2006 and 2007. And like others have stated, LG was already using an award winning design in the Prada before the iphone launched that looks incredibly similar.
You have to ignore A LOT of easily found evidence to think that samsung changed their whole look just to look like a black rectangle. what shape were they before? orange circle? green star?
101. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5975; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)
Samsung's design evolution is going to be the hardest hurdle for Apple to overcome with the jury.
Which is why I have been forecasting a split decision. Apple ain't gonna get no $2.75 Billion out of this.
111. remixfa (Posts: 14226; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)
yea, i think its gonna be a near wash. if apple does not loose a patent or 2 id be surprised. I dont think samsung is gonna get much either. Samsung did a pretty good job within their court restricted constraints to prove they were not massive copy artists and that apple doesnt deserve patents for most of that junk. I still dont get how they can claim they lost 2 billion in profit from sales when they couldnt even keep up with their own demand. lol.
Best result, apple patents invalidated, maybe a MINOR fine to samsung at best, everyone goes home. Apple's lawsuits will be pretty much dead if the patents are invalidated.
Either way, we will see an appeal.
138. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5975; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)
" I still dont get how they can claim they lost 2 billion in profit from sales when they couldnt even keep up with their own demand."
Jurors are going to have a hard time wrapping their heads around that concept as well. It would be one thing if Apple had $2 billion in unsold handsets sitting in warehouses that the jury could see and touch. But selling every phone you could make (and in the process managing to kill workers in an explosion at the factory due to pressure to make more phones) equals a $2 billion loss?
Bush 41 had a term for that kind of math - Voodoo economics....
130. Santi_Santi (unregistered)
Maybe im wrong but in the same picture n.2 i can see an iPhone at the left and a lot of phones who says Samsung on the right... and also says that the iPhone was released on 2007 and the suddenly changes on Samsung phones were in 2010... i dont think i can be confused for a Samsung or an iPhone, also dont believe the "suddenly" changes youre saying because they were made 3 years after...
131. flamencoguy (Posts: 99; Member since: 04 Aug 2012)
Do you think designs are going to stay the same with each new model? It is called convergence. Over time don't all laptops look pretty much alike. Get real. This is childishly simple design.
11. structureman116 (Posts: 135; Member since: 14 Sep 2010)
I hope the US Patent office gets their heads out of their a$$es and stops issuing patents for shapes and colors that have been in existence since long before Apple was a thought in anyones mind!
89. Vinayakn73 (Posts: 189; Member since: 05 Oct 2011)
instead of i will recommend they must keep their hands on their a$$ keeping busy themselves. so that they can't issue those stupid patents.
122. The_Godfather (Posts: 184; Member since: 26 Apr 2012)
I love how Sammy made them speechless with their statements.
SAMMY --------> The beast electronics Company in the world and whatever they said it really makes sense.
Apple-----------> Sir Issac Newton said (in his Apple theory)
"Things which go up come down one day" so your days are coming to end very soon. Learn from your mistakes and respect Samsung who supplies you all the chips for your devices.
15. -box- (Posts: 3915; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)
I love how apple's claims are all based on prior art, and that the closing arguments reinforce that.
Selectable field on a document? Looks and feels like Microsoft Excel, or any other spreadsheet program.
Flat device with rounded corners? DVD cases, clipboards, appliances, furniture, etc etc etc
Colorful icons? We've had that on computers for decades.
Icons in a grid? See above.
Apple was taking a shot in the dark with the design of its devices, as evidenced by all the prototypes that were shown in court. How many different variations of size, shape, and ratios were there? Yeesh
16. Ooooo (Posts: 3; Member since: 21 Aug 2012)
Don't be stubborn, the evidences are there. You just seeing what you don't want to see
43. phitch (Posts: 214; Member since: 06 Mar 2012)
What evidence? I see three companies -- two from Korea and one America that were working on touchscreen phones around the same time. I see evidence from both companies confirming this. I don't see a clone of any device.
20. mandkeee (Posts: 78; Member since: 27 Feb 2009)
SAMSUNG COPIED APPLE....
THAT IS 100% TRUE...
but this website....there are too many android fans here....
samsung is one of really stupid and dirty copycat company....
how i know?
cause my brother used work in samsung development department in korea...
22. ProLife85 (Posts: 3; Member since: 22 Aug 2012)
True, you will see loads of thumbs down comments regarding iOS/Windows' good news. Truly a Fandroid nest here. Pity.
44. Nookie4u (Posts: 131; Member since: 13 Aug 2012)
didn't you know?? PA stands for Paranoid Androids
133. flamencoguy (Posts: 99; Member since: 04 Aug 2012)
Android may not be better! But it represents the resistance to Apple's monopolistic and selfish ways. I would rather buy something lesser than support these bogus patents which are only meant to thwart the competition.
. Did you know that PT stands for Patent Troll. !!
152. RationalThinker (Posts: 3; Member since: 24 Aug 2012)
IMO, Google is the bigger evil of all!
47. joey_sfb (Posts: 3559; Member since: 29 Mar 2012)
The issue here is that we believe more in fair competition over patents of color, shapes and sizes.
Even simple gesture is not true innovation and should not be granted a patent. Its more like coming out a new word to describe new things.
We firmly believe in consumer having a right to choose over Apple having a monoply in a smartphone industry.
Before Apple lawsuit not many company believe they could get ahead of the competition via a patent war but Apple shown them it could be done and now everyone is doing it.
I really don't think its going to fare well for an average consumer like me ending up paying more for less.
If Apple continue on this path it would hurt everyone including Apple loyal consumer as Apple would place higher priority on their lawsuit over inventing innovative product lines that give them the wealth in the first place.
about the comment on "Fandroid nest" unless its a iOS or Windows dedicated site many reader will support Android because its has a user base of 68% just a matter of ratio.
Simply put, iOS is a good OS and Apple deserve its rightful reward. i just don't support Apple lawsuit as a means to an end but rather for Apple to compete with better upcoming products.
153. RationalThinker (Posts: 3; Member since: 24 Aug 2012)
If you believe that some of Samsung products didn't look like iPhone 'knock-offs', I have to say you're delusional... Everybody appreciates fair competition. That's why it matters to speak against those who copy... Apparently Apple offered license to some of the functions which Samsung stole. If Samsung thought price was not right for those licenses, they could've negotiated or had taken it to the court saying Apple is not offering a fair deal. Instead of that they shamelessly start copying design as well as look and feel of iPhone...
BTW, there is a better explanation for your response on 'Fandroid nest'. It is that Android phones are mainly nerds and tech savvy folks. I doubt if most people with iPhone even care to login to gadgets websites.
On the other hand why Fandroids feel compelled to love Samsung so much? Fandroids may say Apple will eventually come suing other phone makers using Android. But it is stupid to think of it as a reason to support Samsung.
I personally find lawsuits, patent wars a bit conservative. But I can understand Apple's frustration when somebody outright copies their products.
118. poojaroy (Posts: 52; Member since: 29 Apr 2012)
not only here we r in the whole world u iass
26. phitch (Posts: 214; Member since: 06 Mar 2012)
Really? Does picture 16 say that Samsung stole the design? Also, here is a question when was the Galaxy S first released?
62. voxmarc (Posts: 320; Member since: 22 Aug 2012)
and you brother was fired that is why your sourgraping?
77. tedkord (Posts: 5623; Member since: 17 Jun 2009)
We just saw that the iPad was a direct copy of the Fidler tablet, and that they were shown it prior to the iPad. Are you prepared to call Apple aa stupid and dirty copycat company?
How do I know? It was just shown in court.
132. flamencoguy (Posts: 99; Member since: 04 Aug 2012)
Samsungs files more patents than Apple each year. It does not need to copy. Rectangular shapes are not copies.
Computer monitors and other display devices were already rectangular. And rounded corners are hardly an innovation.
And black occurs in nature. All of these elements are God given not Apple made. How closely have you followed this issue? Or is this just you shooting from the hip?
154. RationalThinker (Posts: 3; Member since: 24 Aug 2012)
I think I already know where you come from... First of all Samsung can go on to file patents more than any other company in the world. But that doesn't mean Samsung didn't copy... This lawsuit is not just about rectangular shape and black color... Your "God given" nonsense made me lol really
38. OOYL. (Posts: 3; Member since: 22 Aug 2012)
The people here are mad because they're reading what they don't want to read. Sad Samsung
90. Vinayakn73 (Posts: 189; Member since: 05 Oct 2011)
at the end of the day iapple wants only iphone to be rectangular and all other things of other shapes.
just think round buildings, round cars, and the pocket on our shirt is also round.
3. haseebzahid (Posts: 1842; Member since: 22 Feb 2012)
well they finally admited
Samsung = COPY Korian MACHINE
Apple = Greedy American MACHINE
Did i missed something O_o
9. Nookie4u (Posts: 131; Member since: 13 Aug 2012)
Yes you missed something, it's "Korean" =)
76. haseebzahid (Posts: 1842; Member since: 22 Feb 2012)
yes i was wondering did i made spelling mistake
13. wendygarett (unregistered)
You just steal my word :)
18. frydaexiii (Posts: 1241; Member since: 01 Dec 2011)
It's not copying if it's better than the original.
No one calls the iPod "The MPMan F10 copy", bet you don't even know what that is do you? It's the first MP3 player, which surprisingly was made by a Korean Company. Who's copying now?
80. haseebzahid (Posts: 1842; Member since: 22 Feb 2012)
i think Apple and samsung copied their design from a rectagular BRICK they both resembles a brick so am i to assume some brick company should file a patent againt both of them :P cuz that will be crashing the party
4. frydaexiii (Posts: 1241; Member since: 01 Dec 2011)
Well that's business idiots, when someone successfully started something, be prepared for everyone else to jump in. The iPod wasn't the first MP3 player either, it was built off someone elses innovation of a music player that was rising in popularity, Apple just hoped right on and stole the show, you don't see anyone else whining about that.
6. neutralguy (Posts: 1152; Member since: 30 Apr 2012)
Go. Sue LG also, if you really think samsung's icons really are a copy of iPhones. LG's icons are almost similar to samsung's. Go sue other companies for they also have a curved rectangular slab phones.
12. andro. (Posts: 1974; Member since: 16 Sep 2011)
If LGS mobile handset division was as successful as Samsung's then you'd be guaranteed Apple would be court with them. Nearly all touchscreen smart phones are black,rectangular, have a touchscreen on the from center,speaker over the screen and a home button,going by apples way of thinking they could easily have a case to sue every other manufacturer out there because of this,its no coincidence however that they instead have decided to mainly only attack the one company who's mobile decision has been evolving faster,better,with more popularity and success than their own.
7. Nookie4u (Posts: 131; Member since: 13 Aug 2012)
In my opinion, it's quite clear that Samsung copied Apple but for Apple to go that far to take on Samsung, it shows that they're seriously scared.
14. structureman116 (Posts: 135; Member since: 14 Sep 2010)
How can you say they copied Apple when they clearly had a mock-up of a black phone with rounded corners and a centered touchscreen before the iphone was even announced! The fact of the matte is that there are standards in this industry just like with TV's, and the US Patent office is dumber than a box of rocks for giving Apple a patent for a black rectangle. The patents should be nullified and Apple should get punched in the face.
28. phitch (Posts: 214; Member since: 06 Mar 2012)
Really, so two questions what does picture 16 show and when did the Galaxy S get launched?
48. MartyK (Posts: 729; Member since: 11 Apr 2012)
Then Nookie4u, You are as blind as a bat, what we need for you to do is "Safari search engine"
Samsung F700, LG Prade, look at the shape of these phone (fyi the both came out way before the iphone)
Then look at the Galaxy phones and tell us what you think.
146. Nookie4u (Posts: 131; Member since: 13 Aug 2012)
My goodness, i see you guys been desperately defending Sammy, over and over again i might add, especially 'phitch', who's been asking us all the same question all over PA. anyway i've seen F700 and Prada (yes it's Prada, not Prade my friend) but look at Sammy's icons, HTC, LG and others use icons too, but they don't copy the UI do they??? so please,, I don't want to argue, it's just my opinion and obvious truth. Good luck seeing finding the truth. =)
148. remixfa (Posts: 14226; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)
do you see a patent for a green phone icon somewhere that the rest of the world missed? did you also miss the fact that nearly EVERYONE uses a green phone icon, and they used such an icon BEFORE the iphone came out?
Obvious truth indeed.
8. TheLibertine (Posts: 484; Member since: 15 Jan 2012)
Apple vs Samsung aside, but both of the speeches were brilliant.
"Instead of witnesses, they brought you lawyers."
"The fact is that customers make choices, not mistakes."
10. xoutrageousx (Posts: 70; Member since: 22 Dec 2011)
17. redmd (Posts: 938; Member since: 26 Oct 2011)
The "spacebar" is located at the button of the keyboard. Just in case you forgot.