Apple files for patent on haptic feedback system
0. phoneArena 22 Mar 2012, 07:35 posted on
You might remember that when all of those phones that claimed to be "iPhone killers" were launched, most of them had haptic feedback while the iPhone did not; now a patent filing reveals that the Cupertino based firm is seeking a patent on its own haptic feedback system...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. andro. (Posts: 1945; Member since: 16 Sep 2011)
If Apple gets a haptic feedback patent it better be the very very specific version of it and not given generic version of it as haptic feedback has been in phones for years now and would border on the ridiculous!
That saying the haptic feedbacks mentioned in the blackberry storms were terrible and caused so many faults and problems
12. darkkjedii (Posts: 11131; Member since: 05 Feb 2011)
Man andro I hated that feature on the storm. Ho rri ble!!!
22. andro. (Posts: 1945; Member since: 16 Sep 2011)
They were a nightmare for so many customers!
27. stealthd (Posts: 956; Member since: 12 Jun 2011)
Yes, that's how patents work. Thanks for stating the obvious.
3. darktranquillity (Posts: 284; Member since: 28 Feb 2012)
So i guess from now on if a non apple user apply the same amount of pressure on phone screen as a apple user intends to apply, he will be screwed with litigations for patent violation?
4. PimpStrong (Posts: 310; Member since: 25 Jul 2011)
Boy I thought Apple was patent trolling again. Trying to get royalties.
6. frydaexiii (Posts: 1231; Member since: 01 Dec 2011)
ARE...YOU...F^&%^*&...SERIOUS??? WTF is their problem? If they're selling so well why are they so afraid of other companies...Only reason would be because they know they're losing...
14. darkkjedii (Posts: 11131; Member since: 05 Feb 2011)
It seems all they've done is come out with their wn unique system for it. If that's the case, then they should patent it.
31. Lucas777 (Posts: 2137; Member since: 06 Jan 2011)
did u even read what u said? so u think if a company is ahead, they should not look towards any other technologies as that would show they are losing? seriously?
and this patent appears to show haptic feedback in a different way than anyone else has done… so i dont think its a general patent as many have rushed to the conclusion of
7. Sniggly (Posts: 6968; Member since: 05 Dec 2009)
Just one more example of Apple taking an idea from the competition and implementing it while accusing the competition of stealing everything from them.
I have no problem with the former part, just the latter. If Apple weren't so litigous i wouldn't have an issue with them improving their devices. And haptic feedback is an improvement. People who try the keyboards on Android phones constantly comment on how much they like the vibrating response.
11. remixfa (Posts: 13903; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)
I used to love it but now I just keep it off.
16. iamcc (Posts: 1319; Member since: 07 Oct 2011)
I actually like it but as long as it's mild vibration. I don't like the ones that are too strong.
23. andro. (Posts: 1945; Member since: 16 Sep 2011)
I generally leave it off aswell,its a bit of a battery hog over time if you are a heavy texter also. Haptic feedbacks are fine,its the noisy click click noises that people leave turned on on theirs phones when they press the keys thats really frustrating
28. htc_prep (Posts: 303; Member since: 09 Oct 2009)
This seems like Apples way of beating Microsoft and their idea of creating a virtual keyboard that vibrates in the form of the letter or create an actual combo physical and vibration keyboard to the punch rather than monopolize that feature. Just my 2 cents.
8. bragzter (Posts: 44; Member since: 21 Feb 2012)
Apple is playing catch up with the rest of the industry and are trying to make it look like they're doing it better. They had better not get this, because I already smell injunction lawsuits coming against every single competitor.
10. good2great (Posts: 1039; Member since: 22 Feb 2012)
are any of you folks commenting CEO's of cell phone manufacturing companies?
if not, why are yall so MAD about this???
at most, apple will be receiving royalties from mobile phones who have it... yall act like they are gonna BAN all non apple devices that use it... COME ON people!
18. bayusuputra (Posts: 941; Member since: 12 Feb 2012)
"at most, apple will be receiving royalties from mobile phones who have it"
yeah, that's exactly the problem, dumbass.. if apple get this and start suing others, we as customers will have to pay more. for what? for this stupid litigation thing!
if apple wants to patent it, go ahead, but make-so-effing-sure that the patent is very specific, and not just "haptic feedback when user touches the screen".. and don't start suing everybody else who uses different method of vibration feedback..
gosh, i think i will see the adult toy companies being sued as well..
15. darkkjedii (Posts: 11131; Member since: 05 Feb 2011)
Motorola so itso facto google has more patents than apple. So y wouldn't apple apply for a patent if they've developed their own unique haptic system. What wrong with that people?
19. bayusuputra (Posts: 941; Member since: 12 Feb 2012)
i don't have anything against it as long as the patent is for that specific unique method.. and apple better not suing others who have different methods..
what i can see is apple will get this specific patent, but will start suing everybody else who got haptic feedback on their devices..
17. darkkjedii (Posts: 11131; Member since: 05 Feb 2011)
All auto makers have damping system technology, however Chevy developed a specific system for the Corvette zr1. They patented it,and now rake in millions from Ferrari,lambo, and nascar for it's use. Apple would b stupid not patent something if they think it's worth it to do it.
20. bayusuputra (Posts: 941; Member since: 12 Feb 2012)
the difference is Chevy didn't patent it and start suing everybody, but they OFFER the technology, and others buy it.. and that's how apple should do it.. not blindly patenting anything that cross their mind and start suing everybody else..
29. htc_prep (Posts: 303; Member since: 09 Oct 2009)
It's yet to be seen to be seen they will try to get sue happy. Patents dont act retroactively so phones produced before this is enacted are exempt and as long as phones aren't using this exact delivery method future haptic feedback is safe. Products services laws and ideas are always improved upon. Someone had to refine haptic feed back. That just is part of life and evolution.
21. bayusuputra (Posts: 941; Member since: 12 Feb 2012)
Like i always said, i don't really hate apple products, i just hate how they behave like a predator in their business.. it's like, "there should only be one tech company in the world, that's apple, the rest must either bow, or disappear.."
and that's tyranny i must say..
24. skymitch89 (Posts: 1056; Member since: 05 Nov 2010)
And hopefully they don't get it because then basically every smartphone ever made that has haptic feedback will be in violation, and some feature phones as well.
25. EclipseGSX (Posts: 1583; Member since: 18 Oct 2011)
Ah yes I loved my Instinct back in the day. Pretty stupid they weren't the first to use it but want to patent it like they were.
26. drtech (banned) (Posts: 135; Member since: 16 Mar 2012)
So many dumb trolls. Apple isn't trying to patent haptic feedback. They're trying to patent their own unique method of using it.
30. jmoita2 (Posts: 930; Member since: 23 Dec 2011)
Next,Apple is going to patent car chargers and blue tooth headsets. Get a grip!!!
32. kcombs (Posts: 245; Member since: 15 Dec 2010)
I don't know what the big deal is, first thing I did when I got my Galaxy Note was turn haptic feedback off. not something I care to use.