x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.
  • Options
    Close




Apple asks the full Court of Appeals to reverse the decision not to ban the Samsung GALAXY Nexus

0. phoneArena 07 Jan 2013, 17:04 posted on

Apple has filed with the full Federal Circuit Court of Appeals to reexamine a previous ruling made in October not to place an injunction on the Samsung GALAXY Nexus; that decision, made by a three judge panel of the court, set a legal precedent that allows Samsung to keep selling its products while preparing for atrial against Apple next year...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 07 Jan 2013, 17:07 27

1. PhoneArenaUser (Posts: 5497; Member since: 05 Aug 2011)


Apple is afraid. :D

posted on 07 Jan 2013, 17:28 14

14. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5948; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)


More like Apple is iF*cked.

posted on 07 Jan 2013, 17:33 7

16. AnTuTu (Posts: 958; Member since: 14 Oct 2012)


I'd say rotten :p

posted on 07 Jan 2013, 17:46 5

20. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5948; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)


Not iRotten?

posted on 07 Jan 2013, 19:25 3

29. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)


And iCowards.

posted on 08 Jan 2013, 01:04 2

34. anywherehome (Posts: 971; Member since: 13 Dec 2011)


how much iRotten Apple has paid to judges????

posted on 07 Jan 2013, 17:35 6

18. AnTuTu (Posts: 958; Member since: 14 Oct 2012)


Judge will be like "What the f**k is wrong with you little fruit?"

posted on 07 Jan 2013, 17:07 16

2. lolioslol (banned) (Posts: 182; Member since: 10 Dec 2012)


LMFAO. What a bunch of pathetic little crybabies! Waaaah we didn't get our way so we'll kick scream and cry and waste the courts time until we do!

Joke company. This is one of the big reasons they are losing market share and the stock is plummetting. Spend less time litigating, more time designing new products/features and not just resizing the ipod/pad.

posted on 07 Jan 2013, 17:13 9

3. timtimity (Posts: 196; Member since: 13 Aug 2012)


"If Apple fails to get a ruling for the en banc hearing, it can ask the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the case which would be quite unlikely."

Really? I wouldn't be surprised if they did.

posted on 07 Jan 2013, 17:31 3

15. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5948; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)


And just why would the Supremes be interested in intervening in a pissing match over a sales ban?

posted on 07 Jan 2013, 18:01 2

22. Sailingmaster (Posts: 24; Member since: 26 Feb 2012)


Oh I could easily see Apple appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court. But, I don't see the Supreme Court actually hearing the case.

posted on 07 Jan 2013, 18:18 2

26. timtimity (Posts: 196; Member since: 13 Aug 2012)


Yeah, that's what I meant (I could have clarified it better). I can imagine Apple asking the Supreme Court. I can't see them doing anything about it though.

posted on 07 Jan 2013, 17:14 9

4. andro. (Posts: 1971; Member since: 16 Sep 2011)


Forget about childish court cases apple and concentrate on making this years iphone not just the expected iphone 5 's'

posted on 07 Jan 2013, 17:15 9

5. mick25 (banned) (Posts: 110; Member since: 12 Nov 2012)


So when is Google going to get the patent for drop down notification bar and gets every iPhones banned?

posted on 07 Jan 2013, 17:17 4

8. blingblingthing (Posts: 459; Member since: 23 Oct 2012)


I think that patent is still in review to be granted.

posted on 07 Jan 2013, 23:54 1

33. frydaexiii (Posts: 1239; Member since: 01 Dec 2011)


I think the only reason it's still in review after being filed for so long is because they know what will happen the moment the patent is granted, and will have no choice but to ban iPhones since Apple is so openly guilty of violating the patent and are not innovative enough to come up with a workaround.

posted on 08 Jan 2013, 01:07 1

35. anywherehome (Posts: 971; Member since: 13 Dec 2011)


it means they patent every iSh*t so the patent office must be bribed by Apple + Microsoft = pure Evil

how is it to live in such a rotten country which lied about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq so they caused (murdered) thousands because of intentional lie??

posted on 08 Jan 2013, 14:18 1

37. anywherehome (Posts: 971; Member since: 13 Dec 2011)


They=Apple, not Google :-)

posted on 08 Jan 2013, 15:15

38. iCandy (Posts: 46; Member since: 07 Dec 2011)


I believe Samsung is bringing a case against Apple for that patent as a proxy since Google, not making money from Android, can't argue damages.

posted on 07 Jan 2013, 17:15 8

6. blingblingthing (Posts: 459; Member since: 23 Oct 2012)


This must be their "counter event" for all the sweet Android Magic coming to us @ CES 2013.

posted on 07 Jan 2013, 17:21 8

9. opensourceftw (banned) (Posts: 148; Member since: 01 Jan 2013)


LOL yup. On the horizon for Android = 13+mp cameras, quad core processors, flexible displays, NFC integration, etc. On the horizon for apple = MORE LAWSUITS! AND patents for things that don't even exist! Yeah, that's what your customers want. Asstards

posted on 07 Jan 2013, 17:35 5

17. PhoneArenaUser (Posts: 5497; Member since: 05 Aug 2011)


On the horizon for Apple:

5 + S = $

On the horizon for Apple consumers:

Nothing new.

posted on 07 Jan 2013, 18:03 2

24. Droiddoes (unregistered)


Hey now, they might get color choices this time around! That's a HUGE leap for apple!

posted on 07 Jan 2013, 17:16 12

7. jan25 (Posts: 418; Member since: 26 Feb 2012)


go home Apple, you are a drunken failure.

posted on 07 Jan 2013, 17:23 13

10. amiaq (Posts: 499; Member since: 30 Jun 2012)


Not a single thumb down vote can be seen till now. Great!! Everyone HATES Apple.

posted on 07 Jan 2013, 17:24 10

11. techguy22 (Posts: 227; Member since: 09 Aug 2012)


for god sake. stfu already apple.

posted on 07 Jan 2013, 17:25 9

12. fanboy1974 (Posts: 1287; Member since: 12 Nov 2011)


I loved my Nexus when I had but I moved on to bigger things.

Sent from a Note 2.

posted on 07 Jan 2013, 17:26 8

13. drnggaj33 (Posts: 127; Member since: 29 Feb 2012)


this is why apple making the ip5s in diffrent colors and sizes because samsung knows ppl like diffrent thing also i want to see how apple does without samsung chips inside there stuff like the iphone and ipad

posted on 07 Jan 2013, 18:06 3

25. lyndon420 (Posts: 1785; Member since: 11 Jul 2012)


Would be cheaper for apple, and more entertaining for the iUsers if apple just included a box of crayons in the box.

posted on 07 Jan 2013, 17:39 4

19. dragonscourgex (Posts: 307; Member since: 16 Jan 2012)


I think if Apple would cut all this court stuff out, and get rid of all the legal bills, they could most likely reduce the cost of their products.

posted on 07 Jan 2013, 18:02 3

23. Droiddoes (unregistered)


They could but they won't. We're talking about the company that literally charges $100 for 16GB of memory.

posted on 07 Jan 2013, 18:01 5

21. cripton805 (Posts: 995; Member since: 18 Mar 2012)


The case will get thrown out because the Galaxy Nexus probably won't be produced anymore by the time they are done with the case.

Judge Koh doesn't even seem to know much about technology anyway.

posted on 07 Jan 2013, 18:41 3

27. InspectorGadget80 (Posts: 6722; Member since: 26 Mar 2011)


What ever apple NOW u ask to stop the BAN when the GALAXY NEXUS isn't on sale now the LG NEXUS 4 is on sale. JUST ADMIT THAT YOU'RE afraid of COMPETITION and DON'T WANT to see your greedy STOCK plumit

posted on 07 Jan 2013, 19:15 2

28. opensourceftw (banned) (Posts: 148; Member since: 01 Jan 2013)


While you are correct, obviously their strategy of "f*ck making a quality, innovative product let's just ban and sue our way to the top" is not working for them. They are losing market share and their stock is plummeting daily, so I say let em continue. Yeah it's irritating as all hell, but they are only hurting themselves and more importantly, they are hurting their fans by giving them the same boring resized sh*t year after year.
The best thing apple can do for their competition is carry on as they have been the last year >:)

posted on 07 Jan 2013, 21:57

32. MorePhonesThanNeeded (Posts: 645; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)


It's a strategy thing, if they can get the Galaxy Nexus banned they can use that ruling to wreak havoc with other phones in the Android line, including other manufacturers. These are all strategic plan by Apple's lawyers, come on now they won a case with a bar napkin drawing, they will try anything to net some strategic advantage.

posted on 07 Jan 2013, 19:25

30. Zero0 (Posts: 583; Member since: 05 Jul 2012)


Great. Because a phone that's barely even available anymore is worth asking to be banned.

posted on 07 Jan 2013, 21:15

31. networkdood (Posts: 6322; Member since: 31 Mar 2010)


Hey APPLE, meanwhile, the rest of the world wants a Nexus 4 - how do you like them apples?

posted on 08 Jan 2013, 01:37

36. JunkCreek (Posts: 406; Member since: 13 Jul 2012)


In Court, if in one case, you won, then the case get elevated to be valid method to the future case. So i Think, Apple looking for this reason. Apple can ban one the dated device so Apple can banned future device, regardless the device manufacture/brand/name.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories