Apple and Samsung each drop two patents from lawsuit sequel
Making the cuts is a difficult process considering that each side had 22 devices each in the middle of last month. By yesterday, that list was slimmed down to 18 devices each as each side tossed out older models, some of which are no longer sold. Apple has dropped the Samsung Galaxy Player 4.0 and Samsung Galaxy Player 5.0, and both the Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.0 Plus and the Samsung Galaxy Tab 8.9. For its part, Samsung dropped the Apple iPhone 3G, the original generation Apple iPad, and the third-generation Apple iPod touch.
Judge Koh also asked both sides to drop two patents each without prejudice. This means that these claims can be reinstated later in a different case. Apple withdrew its claims on U.S. Patent No. 5,666,502 for a "graphical user interface using historical lists with field classes," and U.S. Patent No. 8,086,604 on a "universal interface for retrieval of information in a computer system". The latter patent you might remember as the '604 Siri patent which dealt with using universal search. This patent originally was used by Apple to get a preliminary injunction on the Samsung GALAXY Nexus which was overturned in Federal Court. Apple is still keeping a similar "Siri" patent in its claims list for the new trial.
The two patents that Samsung has tossed include U.S. Patent No. 7,672,470 for an "audio/video device having a volume control function for an external audio reproduction unit by using volume control buttons of a remote controller and volume control method therefor" and U.S. Patent No. 7,232,058 on a "data displaying apparatus and method".
Each side will have to remove just one patent each before the Thriller with manila folders begins next February.
1. Kurai (unregistered)
the two babies are having a fight again? . . .please feed them milk or something . . .
4. zero1 (Posts: 12; Member since: 17 Jun 2013)
I like to see them fight cuz that will make them develop their devices more and more to improve themselves
7. Kurai (unregistered)
improve? like making the galaxy lineup more plastic and ugly . . . and adding "s" at the end of every version of a new phone model?
19. zero1 (Posts: 12; Member since: 17 Jun 2013)
I see 10 million units of s4 sold in one month you right its ugly why would ppl buy it.
22. Kurai (unregistered)
10 million units were shipped but not sold . . .
15. tedkord (Posts: 5283; Member since: 17 Jun 2009)
I disagree. All this does is distract them from innovating and funnel away resources.
18. james004 (Posts: 486; Member since: 15 May 2013)
They are developing more devices
BUT they arent improving themselves. they both are just using same blueprints for every device.
20. jdoee100 (Posts: 313; Member since: 04 Jun 2013)
This is the tech's biggest joke ever. How could they have a trial at Cupertino, apple's backyard. They might as well hold the court at Apple's headquarter office. This trial is such a joke that's it's not even funny.
If there is such thing as blind justice, they should have moved the trial to another state, or at least another city. How can you get a fair trial, when most of the people are apple employees or connected to apple in some way.
I'd be surprised, if samsung don't get fined another billion or two for anything really.
2. hms2407 (Posts: 94; Member since: 25 Apr 2013)
another day,another patent war....this sh%t is getting boring,apple growup already !!
3. Igneel (unregistered)
You mean, both of them should grow up.. *Aah! Finally! I can comment on PA!
6. PapaSmurf (Posts: 8923; Member since: 14 May 2012)
Welcome to the PA comment section, where you'll get bashed for expressing your opinion.
8. Hallucinator (Posts: 344; Member since: 24 May 2010)
If you are implying that Igneel was bashing anyone with his comment then you need to look up the definition of bashing. If I misunderstood you then I apologize.
11. Igneel (unregistered)
Thanks but I've actually been here for a while already. It's just that PA suddenly banned me from commenting or voting last week :P
14. darkkjedii (Posts: 12663; Member since: 05 Feb 2011)
Yeah Smurf said it right. Be prepared to get ripped apart on this site, just for being honest. Very few unbiased people here. Inspectorgadget80, gmr1, droiddoes, andro, and Troll are pretty bad.
17. jacko1977 (Posts: 400; Member since: 11 Feb 2012)
so a kid gets picked for being better and smarter(samsung) by bully (apple) coz he want all the attention your telling me the
the kid being bullied as no right to stand up to the bully
12. darkkjedii (Posts: 12663; Member since: 05 Feb 2011)
That's funny how you generalized your post, but singled out apple...wink.
5. InspectorGadget80 (Posts: 6740; Member since: 26 Mar 2011)
Jeezes please enough already Apple and stop your damn bogus patent law suit. We have enough of this crap.
13. darkkjedii (Posts: 12663; Member since: 05 Feb 2011)
I believe the article clearly states apple, and Samsung. Foot n mouth
9. roscuthiii (Posts: 1873; Member since: 18 Jul 2010)
Alan, what's the rest of Samsung's U.S. Patent No. 7,232,058?
All you're including is, "...on a 'data displaying apparatus and method'." so then what exactly is the function on a data displaying apparatus and method being described here?
10. jimjam (Posts: 246; Member since: 28 Jun 2011)
If only either side had patent #1 phone that makes calls and does other stuff