Apple and HTC ordered by Judge Koh to reveal which patents are covered by their agreement

3. Mxyzptlk posted on 04 Dec 2012, 19:52 1 26

Untouchable for a reason.

8. metalpoet (unregistered) posted on 04 Dec 2012, 20:05 12 2

Oh god not this chick again!

28. Mxyzptlk posted on 05 Dec 2012, 10:28 0 2

Yes she is the face of true justice.

• This comment is posted in response to #8 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #8 Hide

31. InspectorGadget80 posted on 05 Dec 2012, 19:18 1 0

we should censor her picture

• This comment is posted in response to #8 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #8 Hide

9. Nadr1212 posted on 04 Dec 2012, 20:05 2 0

The judge's eyes look like they're stocking U!!!!!!

11. AnTuTu posted on 04 Dec 2012, 20:09 11 0

Mxyzptlk :- Get a life again :p u dont even know a bit and start commenting without any reason.

29. Mxyzptlk posted on 05 Dec 2012, 10:28 0 4

Speaking the truth is living a life.

• This comment is posted in response to #11 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #11 Hide

16. lyndon420 posted on 04 Dec 2012, 20:30 6 0

Sammy was sued over a billion bucks for something vague that had to do with the UI and a common shape. I think they have all the right in the world to see what the other guy is paying to see who is being treated fairly or not.

23. someones4 posted on 05 Dec 2012, 00:20 1 0

because no one needs them cr@p anyways..

25. tedkord posted on 05 Dec 2012, 03:22 0 0

Because they stole them first, fair and square.

5. networkdood posted on 04 Dec 2012, 19:54 12 0

blame apple and their closed system....they want to patent and own EVERYTHING.....even the market

10. metalpoet (unregistered) posted on 04 Dec 2012, 20:06 7 1

Be careful networkdood, Apple may patent the "comment" then the word "patent" and then the symbole "" haha!

6. lyndon420 posted on 04 Dec 2012, 19:58 4 0

No...they shouldn't. If they can disclose a per device price for some patents, talk crap about FRAND, they should be revealing this as well. Personally...I think something is up with this secrecy. If one company is paying a certain rate for something, it should be even across the board.

17. StringCheese01 posted on 04 Dec 2012, 20:39 5 0

U EAT YO WORDS!

18. Izzy_V posted on 04 Dec 2012, 20:47 0 0

That avi LOL.

21. xtremesv posted on 04 Dec 2012, 22:38 0 0

Yeah of course and then Samsung customers are to pay Apple indirectly for rubber band effects, green icons, rounds and squares. Someone must face Apple and stop them and Samsung is the only company in Android camp that can.

24. someones4 posted on 05 Dec 2012, 00:21 0 0

I said this before as well... you and Apple can just dream on because it's not going to happen.

26. tedkord posted on 05 Dec 2012, 03:25 0 0

I'm sure that if and when Apple offers serious and fair agreement, Samsung will sign. But as long as Apple's stance is, "We get $20 power device for shapes, colors and patterns, and you get $0.001 power device for the actual tech that a phone won't work without, then no, there can't be a deal.

7. networkdood posted on 04 Dec 2012, 20:04 2 0

or is that unmentionables? lol

14. lyndon420 posted on 04 Dec 2012, 20:20 1 0

Lol. I wish the word 'apple' was unmentionable.