Apple: Samsung's royalty proposal was discriminatory
First, it was a former lead patent attorney for Texas Instruments, Richard Donaldson, who said that the royalty Samsung asked for its wireless technology patents was 2.4% of the iPhone's price. That, according to him, is discriminatory, because this tech enabled such a small fraction of the device's features.
In addition, New York University professor Janusz Ordover, another Apple witness, said that these 2.4%, or $14 of the price of the iPhone, are equal to a holdup. "It enabled Samsung's technology to be introduced, to become part of the standard. They have acquired holdup power," argued Ordover.
Could it be that Samsung wanted to put Apple in an unfavorable position through an overly high royalty fee, which would cause the U.S. company to lose hundreds of millions of dollars? Well, business is a dirty game, you know, so we guess companies are doing everything they can in order to overpower their rivals.
Read all our coverage on the Apple v. Samsung trial here!
2. frydaexiii (Posts: 1157; Member since: 01 Dec 2011)
Really? And their asking price from Samsung of $30 per phone & $40 per tablet to use a rectangle isn't? $30 per phone, lets use the Galaxy S3 (since it's Samsung's most expensive at the moment), is almost 5%. 5% to use a friggin rectangle VS 2.4% to use technology that someone had to create. Who's really being discriminatory?
4. XPERIA-KNIGHT (Posts: 2384; Member since: 08 Aug 2012)
sad story man......apple is really ridiculous :(
11. jaytai0106 (Posts: 825; Member since: 30 Mar 2011)
I'm agree with you. Apple is full of their own s**t. Please somebody put all this to an end...
12. master0fursinz (Posts: 104; Member since: 26 Apr 2010)
Dont forget the cost also includes "generic phone icons for contacts, dialer, web and others"...
3. MeoCao (unregistered)
Of course it is discriminatory, a fitting retaliation to Apple's demand of $30 something for all kind of stupid patents.
5. anywherehome (Posts: 971; Member since: 13 Dec 2011)
Apple wanted $30 per phone & $40 per tablet to use a rectangle from Samsung.
another proof how Apple is rotten, lying, stealing, bribing, ....
how any one can buy an Apple rotten product? just a complete rotten and immoral person or who just do not know what the IT abbreviation means...
7. remixfa (Posts: 13902; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)
I was about to mention the same thing lol
Yea, having to pay for an actual tech patent is discriminatory, but trying to charge Samsung nearly 4x that amount for vague rectangle patents is "OK". lol.
What a bunch of bafoons.
13. kabukijoe (Posts: 65; Member since: 06 Mar 2010)
Come on guys, Apple invented rectangels. They patented them. Lol.
6. Aeires (unregistered)
Patents might cost Apple hundreds of millions. Meanwhile, Apple breaks the $600 billion mark. Sorry Apple, hard to find the sympathy.
15. jroc74 (Posts: 3978; Member since: 30 Dec 2010)
Apple claimed Samsung hurt them financially....and yet they break the 600....billion....mark. Thats billion with a B, not million.
Stop being so damn greedy Apple!!!
8. nagabiru003 (Posts: 11; Member since: 04 Jun 2012)
"It enabled Samsung's technology to be introduced, to become part of the standard", wow, stealing and stabbing at the same time, nice play.....
why don't you say "It enabled the freakin' rectangular shape to be (re)introduced, to become part of the standard".
9. Savage (Posts: 431; Member since: 28 Jul 2012)
Others already said what was on my mind. $14 for wireless tech patent is unreasonable but $40 for black rectangles is? Apparently even $600 billion isn't enough to satisfy your greed.
10. casbah70 (Posts: 16; Member since: 21 Jun 2011)
is this wireless patent the one that allows photos to be sent out via email? I'm not apple fan-boy, but I have to agree that it is a small part of what the device can do. Of course, 2.4% is a pretty small percentage.
14. tha.fox (Posts: 100; Member since: 30 Nov 2011)
Everyone hates touchwiz anyways samsungs icons are the worst out of every android and thats what apples mad about haha. If samsung has a different interface they would be even better apples ugly icons held sammy back a bit in my opinion. Motorolas icons are the best by far
16. letgomyeggroll (Posts: 137; Member since: 13 Jun 2012)
Touch screen, rectangle, square email attachment and etc that Apple patent is no new technology. Its been around for yearssssssssssssss, and Apple modified and than patented it. Their products has been that great, if it wasn't for their marketing dept it will not made where is now. They got the best marketing dept by far not best product. And also bunch lawyers that convince an eskimo that that an ice is created by eskimo. Apple needs to face the facts their products will not work without Samsung PERIOD!!!!! Every single device out there has Samsung in it!!!!!!!!!!!!
17. zhypher_23 (Posts: 195; Member since: 04 Jun 2012)
One Word, Ridiculous. Apple's greed never gets full.