PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.
  • Options
    Close




Appeals court kicks Samsung GALAXY Tab 10.1 injunction decision back to Judge Koh

0. phoneArena posted on 29 Sep 2012, 02:11

The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled in Samsung's favor in remanding the Korean manufacturer's request to lift the injunction on the Samsung GALAXY Tab 10.1 back to Judge Lucy Koh's courtroom...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

Want to comment? Please login or register.

1. ElektronicGeek91 posted on 29 Sep 2012, 02:22 26 4

Apple is a joke.... I think they're just real scared Samsung gonna take them out of business aha

6. Danre posted on 29 Sep 2012, 03:31 12 2

Apple know that there i$**p are fools .Only rounded corner is enough to make confuse with other product.
So, no wonder apple files too many patent cases,

17. Jelly_Bean posted on 29 Sep 2012, 18:03 1

Hahahaahahahhaahha

Season is changing so just wait and watch until whole Apple get rotten....!! lolzzzzzzzzzz

23. PhenomFaz posted on 30 Sep 2012, 07:16 1

Koh = krap!
All sales figures show a relative decline for the shipment, demand and sales of iPhone 5 as and when compared to their own previous figures so the writing's on the wall!

2. Nathan_ingx posted on 29 Sep 2012, 02:29 9

So it's back to square 1?

5. Droid_X_Doug posted on 29 Sep 2012, 03:13 3

How so? Either way (injunction being released or continued), according to Sammy, they have not been affected by the injunction.

16. SellsPhones posted on 29 Sep 2012, 13:19

I see what you did there..

3. Danre posted on 29 Sep 2012, 03:08 7 2

He who takes offense when no offense is intended is a fool, and he who takes offense when offense is intended is a greater fool...... same goes to APPLE....

7. Nookie4u posted on 29 Sep 2012, 04:43 7 1

Loading...

8. Seymur posted on 29 Sep 2012, 07:06 1

Not responding, Force close?

4. SamsungFan posted on 29 Sep 2012, 03:10 14 2

Apple s**k

9. Angkor posted on 29 Sep 2012, 07:30 7

Samsung must appeal to the US Supreme Court to throw out $3 billions Apple won and requested additional by crazy Judge Koh.

10. sarb009 posted on 29 Sep 2012, 07:52 5

yuck apple sukk

12. Royal.Troll. (banned) posted on 29 Sep 2012, 10:26 2

They really do.

11. Lysdesic posted on 29 Sep 2012, 08:14 2

I love how this works out perfectly as an example for my politics assignment: basically, I need to give an example of flaws in the United States government. And the Apple Vs Samsung case works perfectly: Its tiresome, s**t doesn't get done, and the judges/juries seem to have their heads shoved up their asses.

I mean really? Apple is just being a douche, nothing new. But why does it seem that they have the advantage. The companies should be able to coexist without all this bulls**t and spineless attempts to screw each other over.

13. JunkCreek posted on 29 Sep 2012, 11:16 1

Apple: PC they loose - Windows dominated while using Mac is just cool

Smartphone: If Apple loose, what else they're gonna sell? charger? lightning cables? they are compactible with nothing on earth but just for Apple.

So, if Apple loose in Smartphone, they loose everything and so United States would loose some more as Wall Street must be down if Apple gone. That's why US defense Apple so greatly. But I don't know, Microsoft also so big, so it would be nothing to loose to loose Apple, accept may be there would be again so many people become unemployed and that's would affect US economic once again.

15. Droid_X_Doug posted on 29 Sep 2012, 11:28 2

Ummm. Could you provide some 'proof' to back up your assertions? I could claim that the Moon is made of green cheese, but without proof, it would be just so much blather.

14. xfire99 posted on 29 Sep 2012, 11:20 2

What the heck do u need jurys for, if a judge can overrule its decision and is Koh blind or something?
Looks fishy all and Koh is surely awaiting a big fat check later.
9 peoples have wrong vs 1 stupid blind judge?

18. gallitoking posted on 29 Sep 2012, 19:01 1

so far Sammy has been all bark no bite.. Apple is waiting for their device ban that Sammy claimed it was going to do because of LTE... the Galaxy tab hasnt sold because it was a copycat product..

19. Droid_X_Doug posted on 29 Sep 2012, 20:18 1

No bite? Nothing like selling 20 million GS IIIs in 100 days for bite. Meanwhile, Apple sold what, 5 or 6 million iP5s on opening weekend and Timmy had to publicly express 'extreme sorrow' for the perfidious lash-up that is iMaps....

Yeah, sounds like Sammy is an empty chair.

21. PapaSmurf posted on 29 Sep 2012, 20:36 1

Don't forget the scatches on the "premium aluminum", wifi issues, the cracks and scratches that came with the phone, and the light issues.

22. PhenomFaz posted on 30 Sep 2012, 07:13

I ahve personally listed 12 defects an iPhone 5 unit has out of the box!!! And it just doesn't seem to end there

20. PapaSmurf posted on 29 Sep 2012, 20:34

So based on your logic, the Samsung Galaxy SIII is a device that isn't going to sell because Apple says its a direct copy of their iPhone?

Want to comment? Please login or register.

  • LG Optimus F3LG Optimus F3
  • Kyocera Hydro EDGEKyocera Hydro EDGE
  • Kyocera Hydro XTRMKyocera Hydro XTRM
  • Nokia Lumia 925Nokia Lumia 925
  • BlackBerry Q5BlackBerry Q5
  • Sony Xperia ZRSony Xperia ZR
  • Nokia Lumia 928Nokia Lumia 928
  • Vertu TiVertu Ti
View all