x PhoneArena is looking for new authors in New York! To view all available positions, click here.
  • Options
    Close




Appeals court kicks Samsung GALAXY Tab 10.1 injunction decision back to Judge Koh

0. phoneArena 29 Sep 2012, 02:11 posted on

The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled in Samsung's favor in remanding the Korean manufacturer's request to lift the injunction on the Samsung GALAXY Tab 10.1 back to Judge Lucy Koh's courtroom...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 29 Sep 2012, 02:22 26

1. ElektronicGeek91 (Posts: 105; Member since: 26 Sep 2012)


Apple is a joke.... I think they're just real scared Samsung gonna take them out of business aha

posted on 29 Sep 2012, 03:31 12

6. Danre (Posts: 85; Member since: 02 Sep 2012)


Apple know that there i$**p are fools .Only rounded corner is enough to make confuse with other product.
So, no wonder apple files too many patent cases,

posted on 29 Sep 2012, 18:03 1

17. Jelly_Bean (Posts: 109; Member since: 11 Sep 2012)


Hahahaahahahhaahha

Season is changing so just wait and watch until whole Apple get rotten....!! lolzzzzzzzzzz

posted on 30 Sep 2012, 07:16 1

23. PhenomFaz (Posts: 1067; Member since: 26 Sep 2012)


Koh = krap!
All sales figures show a relative decline for the shipment, demand and sales of iPhone 5 as and when compared to their own previous figures so the writing's on the wall!

posted on 29 Sep 2012, 02:29 9

2. Nathan_ingx (Posts: 3009; Member since: 07 Mar 2012)


So it's back to square 1?

posted on 29 Sep 2012, 03:13 3

5. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5724; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)


How so? Either way (injunction being released or continued), according to Sammy, they have not been affected by the injunction.

posted on 29 Sep 2012, 13:19

16. SellsPhones (Posts: 1; Member since: 18 Sep 2012)


I see what you did there..

posted on 29 Sep 2012, 03:08 7

3. Danre (Posts: 85; Member since: 02 Sep 2012)


He who takes offense when no offense is intended is a fool, and he who takes offense when offense is intended is a greater fool...... same goes to APPLE....

posted on 29 Sep 2012, 04:43 7

7. Nookie4u (Posts: 127; Member since: 13 Aug 2012)


Loading...

posted on 29 Sep 2012, 07:06 1

8. Seymur (unregistered)


Not responding, Force close?

posted on 29 Sep 2012, 03:10 14

4. SamsungFan (Posts: 201; Member since: 16 Apr 2012)


Apple s**k

posted on 29 Sep 2012, 07:30 7

9. Angkor (Posts: 108; Member since: 05 Jul 2012)


Samsung must appeal to the US Supreme Court to throw out $3 billions Apple won and requested additional by crazy Judge Koh.

posted on 29 Sep 2012, 07:52 5

10. sarb009 (Posts: 286; Member since: 15 Jun 2011)


yuck apple sukk

posted on 29 Sep 2012, 10:26 2

12. Royal.Troll. (banned) (Posts: 2; Member since: 29 Sep 2012)


They really do.

posted on 29 Sep 2012, 08:14 2

11. Lysdesic (Posts: 1; Member since: 29 Sep 2012)


I love how this works out perfectly as an example for my politics assignment: basically, I need to give an example of flaws in the United States government. And the Apple Vs Samsung case works perfectly: Its tiresome, s**t doesn't get done, and the judges/juries seem to have their heads shoved up their asses.

I mean really? Apple is just being a douche, nothing new. But why does it seem that they have the advantage. The companies should be able to coexist without all this bulls**t and spineless attempts to screw each other over.

posted on 29 Sep 2012, 11:16 1

13. JunkCreek (Posts: 402; Member since: 13 Jul 2012)


Apple: PC they loose - Windows dominated while using Mac is just cool

Smartphone: If Apple loose, what else they're gonna sell? charger? lightning cables? they are compactible with nothing on earth but just for Apple.

So, if Apple loose in Smartphone, they loose everything and so United States would loose some more as Wall Street must be down if Apple gone. That's why US defense Apple so greatly. But I don't know, Microsoft also so big, so it would be nothing to loose to loose Apple, accept may be there would be again so many people become unemployed and that's would affect US economic once again.

posted on 29 Sep 2012, 11:28 2

15. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5724; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)


Ummm. Could you provide some 'proof' to back up your assertions? I could claim that the Moon is made of green cheese, but without proof, it would be just so much blather.

posted on 29 Sep 2012, 11:20 2

14. xfire99 (Posts: 481; Member since: 14 Mar 2012)


What the heck do u need jurys for, if a judge can overrule its decision and is Koh blind or something?
Looks fishy all and Koh is surely awaiting a big fat check later.
9 peoples have wrong vs 1 stupid blind judge?

posted on 29 Sep 2012, 19:01

18. gallitoking (Posts: 4684; Member since: 17 May 2011)


so far Sammy has been all bark no bite.. Apple is waiting for their device ban that Sammy claimed it was going to do because of LTE... the Galaxy tab hasnt sold because it was a copycat product..

posted on 29 Sep 2012, 20:18 1

19. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5724; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)


No bite? Nothing like selling 20 million GS IIIs in 100 days for bite. Meanwhile, Apple sold what, 5 or 6 million iP5s on opening weekend and Timmy had to publicly express 'extreme sorrow' for the perfidious lash-up that is iMaps....

Yeah, sounds like Sammy is an empty chair.

posted on 29 Sep 2012, 20:36 1

21. PapaSmurf (Posts: 8186; Member since: 14 May 2012)


Don't forget the scatches on the "premium aluminum", wifi issues, the cracks and scratches that came with the phone, and the light issues.

posted on 30 Sep 2012, 07:13

22. PhenomFaz (Posts: 1067; Member since: 26 Sep 2012)


I ahve personally listed 12 defects an iPhone 5 unit has out of the box!!! And it just doesn't seem to end there

posted on 29 Sep 2012, 20:34

20. PapaSmurf (Posts: 8186; Member since: 14 May 2012)


So based on your logic, the Samsung Galaxy SIII is a device that isn't going to sell because Apple says its a direct copy of their iPhone?

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories