Android-based Nokia XL officially available starting today
0. phoneArena 07 May 2014, 14:54 posted on
Sold for around $150 (unlocked), the XL is Nokia's Android-based flagship handset. Even so, it remains a low-end device that's targeted at emerging markets...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. FriendsOfSamsung (unregistered)
I think I'm pass, thanks but no thanks Nokia
2. sgodsell (Posts: 1388; Member since: 16 Mar 2013)
They should have made a better Android smartphone. Since its their first kick at the can with a forked Android smartphone. Especially since it has a really low spec 1ghz dual core S4 play Cortex-A5 CPU. A lot of people don't realize that a Cortex-A5 and a Cortex-A9 CPU with the same clock speed. The Cortex-A9 is roughly 40%-60% faster then a Cortex-A5 CPU.
12. walnuttt (Posts: 96; Member since: 11 Apr 2014)
this is not an android phone but just a "wanna be android phone". It doesn't have a Play store so not a real android phone. Don't get fooled by Nokia instead buy a real android phone like Samsung, Sony, LG etc. with a Play store. Nokia is gone. Truth hurts.
16. janis (Posts: 45; Member since: 10 Mar 2014)
this one looks cool for older ppl who don't need di*k rate sensors and 20mpx cameras. so specs fanboys go back to samsung related posts.
i would really get this one for my mother, good big screen easy to use, perfect price.
24. kabhijeet.16 (Posts: 657; Member since: 05 Dec 2012)
Old people dont care about touchscreens & social apps & plastic/metal build. They care about good cameras. If they dont, they might do well with Nokia 3310..
27. jroc74 (Posts: 5192; Member since: 30 Dec 2010)
The Kindle Fire has no problems not having Google apps....
if it works well, thats all that matters.
Amazon app store is a good alternative to the Play Store. Nokia just needs to have a good alternative too. Hell, go with Amazon's.
6. ErenJaeger (Posts: 119; Member since: 22 Apr 2014)
FriendsofSamsung giving a polite response??? Thats a first. Good job! ;)
8. Arte-8800 (banned) (Posts: 4562; Member since: 13 Mar 2014)
Looks like he's a ex Nokia fan
That's why he's post is neutral
3. xq10xa (Posts: 137; Member since: 07 Dec 2010)
It would be a unique phone to own...but in all honesty...this phone is pretty boot.
4. torr310 (Posts: 423; Member since: 27 Oct 2011)
Nokia probably wants to make their Android as low-end and Window Phone as high-end.
14. akki20892 (Posts: 3617; Member since: 04 Feb 2013)
They should have been made high end Android, and gave one chance.
15. Arte-8800 (banned) (Posts: 4562; Member since: 13 Mar 2014)
Nokia should make 1 high end Nokia Android phone
5. GreekGeek (Posts: 844; Member since: 22 Mar 2014)
The NOKIA X line is a prime candidate for the worst phone(s) of the year
7. elitewolverine (Posts: 1927; Member since: 28 Oct 2013)
Only one that really competes is the Moto G at 180 MSRP vs 150. The big advantage is the dual sim card, and for some that matters more than processor or memory.
13. sprockkets (Posts: 1307; Member since: 16 Jan 2012)
Considering the moto g is sold with a dual sim in other areas, nope, not an advantage.
29. sgodsell (Posts: 1388; Member since: 16 Mar 2013)
The moto g should not be even compared to this low level Nokia X phone. Anyone with half an education could easily see that the Nokia X is inferior in every way compared to moto g. Both in hardware specs and software.
17. janis (Posts: 45; Member since: 10 Mar 2014)
do u have any idea about marketing?
it costs 3times less than ur plastic samsung s5, this one is not for those who buy phones for everything, gaming pro photos healthcare :d and other cool and useless features. so i would say in this price range its cool phone.
9. N-fanboy (Posts: 538; Member since: 12 Jan 2013)
Its funny how this phone looks better than all samsung smartphones ever made, the nexus 4&5, moto g, moto x, oppo find 7&7a and even the oneplus one. Its not even subjective, it just looks good. But its a sh¡t of a phone lol even for its price point.
11. tech2 (Posts: 2333; Member since: 26 Oct 2012)
Just looks like a bar of soap to me :|
BTW, better then Oppo...... Nyahhh
30. sgodsell (Posts: 1388; Member since: 16 Mar 2013)
This is a perfect example of how something or someone could look great on the outside, but be completely rotten in the inside. Just like the Nokia X.
10. davidtb (Posts: 23; Member since: 03 Aug 2012)
It's a shame too, people have the same passion for Nokia hardware that they have for Motorola. They're great making cake, but suck with the icing.
19. Diezparda (Posts: 212; Member since: 23 Oct 2013)
Why such low-end device Nokia? i mean compared to other company flagship this year Nokia XL is nothing...
20. kindlefireowner (Posts: 426; Member since: 05 Dec 2011)
I never think about buying a phone made for emerging markets. So why is PA covering an emerging market phone.
23. vijaysivakula (Posts: 169; Member since: 17 Aug 2011)
because you are not the only person in the world.
21. henrik6504 (Posts: 9; Member since: 24 Aug 2012)
It have its own Nokia store for apps. Many porting their Android apps to it:
Look for Nokia "X Porting Bus European Tour 2014" in YouTube and see.
And Yandex store and others is avaible to. Yes it have not the official Google Play but its not a empty store.
22. Cyberchum (Posts: 273; Member since: 24 Oct 2012)
I'll buy it simply for the built quality. I used the X the other day and frankly speaking, it's the most sturdy android phone I've held. To remove the back cover is the most challenging part.
25. kartikeyarathi8 (Posts: 12; Member since: 06 Jan 2014)
yes Nokia X series r way better than android devices, just that RAM size needs to be more.
28. xche78x (Posts: 101; Member since: 11 Mar 2014)
this one is late even for emerging markets and the pricing is horrible, for the same price mediatek phones offer HD screen, quad core a7 performance 6589/6582 and complete android experience people learnt to use and like...https://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=vXgpffAxcfswiko rainbow is just $114 USD here, its the almost perfect 5" HD budget phone...