x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.
  • Options
    Close




Analyst says after failing to help with patent cases, Google overpaid for Motorola

0. phoneArena 30 Apr 2013, 01:17 posted on

When Google purchased Motorola back in August 2011,the idea was for Google to use Motorola's gigantic portfolio of patents to protect it from the number of patent cases that were just starting to spring up; of the $12.4 billion purchase price, $5.5 billion was for patents and developed technology, but so fat the purchase of Motorola has been a fail...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 30 Apr 2013, 01:42

1. UrbanPhantom (Posts: 949; Member since: 30 Oct 2012)


I think Google should have bought Nokia instead of Motorola Mobility, but it is possible that deal was never going to be on the table. In any event, Microsoft now has Nokia to champion Windows Phone, and is making full use of them even without having made a direct purchase...

posted on 30 Apr 2013, 01:59 3

3. lyndon420 (Posts: 1785; Member since: 11 Jul 2012)


A direct purchase no, but ms pumps millions into Nokia to keep them at ms's beck and call.

posted on 30 Apr 2013, 03:02 3

7. Fossi (Posts: 3; Member since: 23 Apr 2013)


Main thing stands Nokia isn´t for sale and hasn´t been for sale.. So stop with the trolling that Microsoft controls Nokia.. That last sentence goes to everyone

posted on 30 Apr 2013, 05:42 2

10. Hemlocke (unregistered)


Nokia is, and has been, for sale. Apple, Google, or anyone else, could just swoop in and buy them today. That is always a scenario when you are a publicly traded company.

posted on 30 Apr 2013, 12:20

15. InspectorGadget80 (Posts: 6736; Member since: 26 Mar 2011)


too give u a history note it was MOTOROLA who invented the cell phone.

posted on 30 Apr 2013, 01:45

2. jinxed (Posts: 107; Member since: 10 Jan 2013)


wont the wireless standards some under Motorola Solutions? And did Google buy both Motorola Solutions and Mobility ?

posted on 30 Apr 2013, 02:14

4. FlushGordon (unregistered)


Jusr wondering why the heck Google is using SAMSUNG, ASUS and LG as their NEXUS flag bearer instead of MOTOROLLA? doesn't make sense

posted on 01 May 2013, 12:03

16. DFranch (Posts: 140; Member since: 20 Apr 2012)


because if they use Motorolla for the nexus, then it may look like Google is showing favortism to Motorolla. They don't want any of their partners to think they are getting sloppy seconds, they might re-think their investment in Android.

posted on 30 Apr 2013, 02:16

5. StreetNerd (Posts: 722; Member since: 08 Dec 2010)


The last 12 years they havent sold any moto phones here in the Netherlands :')

posted on 30 Apr 2013, 02:44

6. roscuthiii (Posts: 1873; Member since: 18 Jul 2010)


Moto was bought as a means of patent protection against suits, not really for going on the patent offense. Could be wrong but the listed suits were those already filed (and/or counter claims) my Moto before the purchase .
Analysts... half of what come out of their mouths is wrong, half is just BS.

Also, "the ITC ruled that Apple's patent for a proximity sensor was not infringed on by Apple."???
Maybe make one of those Apples a Moto instead. I'll even let you pick which one, I'm sure you can get it right.

posted on 30 Apr 2013, 04:15

8. JMartin22 (Posts: 1245; Member since: 30 Apr 2013)


Given how hostile their competitors were... err are; I can't blame Google for trying to take a procurement in investing their model in an increasingly litigious environment. A shame it seems to be taking an opposite effect.

posted on 30 Apr 2013, 05:33

9. joey_sfb (Posts: 3244; Member since: 29 Mar 2012)


I rather Google put in more effort in motorola r & d and manufacturing! Company always lead thru these means.

Have you ever seen a technological company lead thru persuasive legality?

posted on 30 Apr 2013, 10:39

13. Bilpocalypse (Posts: 301; Member since: 13 Oct 2012)


Apple maybe.

posted on 30 Apr 2013, 07:05 1

11. Aeires (unregistered)


Analysts, have any of them gotten anything right?

posted on 30 Apr 2013, 09:14

12. lubba (Posts: 1311; Member since: 17 Jan 2011)


@UrbanPhantom... For the last 3 year, I never heard any news anywhere that Nokia is for sale. I did though hear couple of weeks ago Nokia made the right choice in choosing WP. Isn't that great! MS and Nokia are business partners. There is no conspiracy theory. I do believe though that if Nokia chose Android, they would have sunk fast and would have been put up for sale. Who would buy them, who knows?

posted on 30 Apr 2013, 12:20

14. InspectorGadget80 (Posts: 6736; Member since: 26 Mar 2011)


I think it was a wise choice. we don't want too see Motorola go bankrupt or loose too the competition. their still a good way Motorola can come back too the top like they did with their RAZR phones years ago. Sometimes I think analyst are a bunch of numbskulls. They think they know whats right cause they think they can predict in the future but their wrong

posted on 29 Dec 2013, 22:19

17. techloverNYC (Posts: 422; Member since: 20 Nov 2012)


MOTOROLA, Blackberry, and Nokia.....any1 besides me remember the glory day.........

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories