Amazon listings confirm AT&T and T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S III, SIM-free units priced at $799
1. abdane posted on 18 May 2012, 03:52 9 0
i hope the T-Mobile version would feature quad core as T-Mobile doesnt feature LTE !!! as i dont live in USA but i hope the best for them :)
7. gwuhua1984 posted on 18 May 2012, 12:07 1 0
Even better, just have the quad and LTE version since they're rolling out LTE next year.
9. stuyjcp posted on 19 May 2012, 11:31 0 0
might not happen if the new exynos doesn't support their aws network. (see galaxy s ii)
2. som posted on 18 May 2012, 04:53 7 0
Thanks Abdane for your good heart, I am a T-Mobile USA customer for 7 years and I wish S3 quad-core come to T-Mobile too.
3. JunitoNH posted on 18 May 2012, 08:10 4 0
$799 - should I purchase a pc; save another $300, and buy an used car; or walk and purchase the plastic phone. Decision, decision!!!!!!
4. Jyakotu posted on 18 May 2012, 09:07 2 0
Sorry, I can't see the justification of buying an $800 smartphone. Like, what average consumer has $800 laying around to buy a phone that will become obsolete in a couple of months.? Sorry for being cynical, I just need to see the value.
8. Chronos posted on 18 May 2012, 21:21 0 0
Every high-end unlocked phone should cost no more than $500.
10. Baseballer posted on 19 May 2012, 14:03 0 0
Make the sellers here you then. Start something. Something huge to let the company's know we deserve cheaper prices. Dont let them change the industry and prices. We should be the ones changing everything!
11. 1ceTr0n posted on 21 May 2012, 13:59 0 0
S3 does look nice, but im still not giving up my sexy white Galaxy Note. I do think its funny and sad irony that Verizon is once again giving the finger to so many customers by not having the S3 on their network. I don't regret leaving them last month after being a customer all these years with them, pay early term fee and getting my Note on AT&T. Bye bye red V