x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options
    Close






Alleged Galaxy S5 (SM-G900F) version appears on AnTuTu with 2.5 GHz chipset and 3 GB of RAM

0. phoneArena 19 Dec 2013, 05:45 posted on

An eventual Samsung Galaxy S5 candidate has been unearthed, under the codename SM-G900F, in AnTuTu's benchmark database. The handset seems restricted to 1080p display resolution, despite the numerous rumors about it sporting a 2K HD, 1440x2560 pixels screen. It, however, flaunts the fastest Snapdragon 800 quad-core chipset - MSM8974AC - clocked at 2.5 GHz, has 3 GB of RAM, and 32 GB of internal memory. A 2 MP front shooter is detected, and a generous 16 MP camera, likely the one with ISOCELL technology that Samsung bragged about not long ago...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 06:10 19

1. muser793 (Posts: 59; Member since: 15 Aug 2013)


only 3GBs of ram?! is this a joke?! I wanna play Halo 5 on my phone, I need more ram and ofc more pixels! fu** the battery life, OS n design!

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 18:12 4

36. darkkjedii (Posts: 22130; Member since: 05 Feb 2011)


You should design, and build your own phone. All the ram you want then.

posted on 23 Dec 2013, 15:21 1

37. lacrossebowler (Posts: 8; Member since: 06 Dec 2012)


You should get a job and leave the Halo 5 to the kids. And if you are a kid then hit the books.

posted on 26 Dec 2013, 14:06

40. ThePython (Posts: 897; Member since: 08 May 2013)


#FirstWorldProblems

posted on 02 Jan 2014, 10:38

43. techguymatt (Posts: 18; Member since: 04 Nov 2013)


rumors are rumors.... take an apple pill....

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 06:12 7

2. Cesar (Posts: 139; Member since: 16 Aug 2012)


I will bet that the Samsung Galaxy S5 will not be a 64 bits, no 16MP camera, no 2K Screen resolution and no metal building! I bet! Who agree with me?

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 06:31 6

9. JakeLee (banned) (Posts: 1021; Member since: 02 Nov 2013)


Me. It would be suicidal and foolish launching a 64-bit phone running a 32-bit OS.

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 07:47 4

17. sipha (Posts: 435; Member since: 12 May 2012)


Isn't that what Apple did??

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 08:05 5

19. JakeLee (banned) (Posts: 1021; Member since: 02 Nov 2013)


No. 5s came with 64-bit iOS7.

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 10:58 6

29. sipha (Posts: 435; Member since: 12 May 2012)


does it have any benifit without 4GB of Ram??

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 13:07 2

31. Dr.Phil (Posts: 1334; Member since: 14 Feb 2011)


It would be quite easy for Android to become 64-bit capable since it is based on Linux which has been 64-bit capable for a while now. To sum it up better:

"Android uses a virtual machine in which apps are run, so only the Dalvik VM will need to be updated to 64-bit. Existing apps aren’t likely going to need any changes at all."

http://pocketnow.com/2013/10/08/android-64-bit-2

posted on 24 Dec 2013, 14:24

38. kozza3 (Posts: 702; Member since: 17 Oct 2012)


i wonder if ART would need the same thing

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 06:43 4

11. SAYED-EJAZ (Posts: 225; Member since: 10 Oct 2013)


It will be having 64bit , 16MP camera and ofcourse 2K screen .
but there will huge wrap on design but i doubt it will be metal but it will surely something better.
only question is now is will the 64bit exynos will be 14nm or 20nm ?
will they include FDD lte and TDD lte on this chip ? ( both together as china and india will be using TDD lte )

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 07:37

16. dratomic (Posts: 483; Member since: 09 Oct 2013)


totally

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 07:54 3

18. sid07desai (Posts: 290; Member since: 03 May 2012)


2k amoled could be possible. And there wouldn't be a significant difference between 13mp and 16mp samsung cams. And metal body usually implies a unibody design or a non-removable battery, which is not Samsung's style.

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 10:13

24. InspectorGadget80 (unregistered)


U should at least wait till their unveiling till next May-June. never read rumor reports that doesn't have THE REAL DETAILS

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 10:42

26. zuckerboy (banned) (Posts: 898; Member since: 22 Dec 2011)


I dont agree with you. mark my words, it will have 2K and 16mp but Im not sure about 64bit...

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 06:17 2

3. itsdeepak4u2000 (Posts: 3718; Member since: 03 Nov 2012)


This is not S5 for sure as it should have score atleast near to Note 3 (31k+), where G2 has 35k+ AnTuTu score.

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 09:14

22. WindowsiDroid (Posts: 137; Member since: 22 Jul 2013)


Yeah, I think it is the so called "F SERIES'?

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 06:22 9

4. mittalmailbox (Posts: 51; Member since: 14 Feb 2012)


Samsung won't use snapdragon 800 in s5, they will go for snapdragon 805 or exynos 64 bit.

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 06:22 5

5. mittalmailbox (Posts: 51; Member since: 14 Feb 2012)


Samsung won't use snapdragon 800 in s5, they will go for snapdragon 805 or exynos 64 bit.

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 06:22 4

6. mittalmailbox (Posts: 51; Member since: 14 Feb 2012)


Samsung won't use snapdragon 800 in s5, they will go for snapdragon 805 or exynos 64 bit.

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 06:24 1

7. chunk1x (Posts: 248; Member since: 25 Jun 2011)


Probably faked the results again.

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 06:28

8. JakeLee (banned) (Posts: 1021; Member since: 02 Nov 2013)


That might be very well real since I can hardly imagine a 64-bit GS5 with 64-bit Android nowhere in sight.

A wise move I'd say.

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 06:37 2

10. bigstrudel (Posts: 518; Member since: 20 Aug 2012)


Same overclocked old SoC architecture from Qualcomm.

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 08:08

20. JakeLee (banned) (Posts: 1021; Member since: 02 Nov 2013)


It's understandable. Sammy had no other choice.

How well it will sell is a different question though.

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 07:01 1

12. taikucing (unregistered)


Still can't impress me after I saw Vivo Xplay 3S with almost the same spec, beautiful metal body, beautiful UI, but only costs $580.
*cough* Samsung rapes your wallet *cough*

posted on 26 Dec 2013, 20:44

41. confidential_1 (Posts: 1; Member since: 26 Dec 2013)


*cough* so does apple*cough*

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 07:04 3

13. taikucing (unregistered)


Another week, another galaxy (hello cheap plastic & stupid design, we meet again).

posted on 19 Dec 2013, 07:05 4

14. Desmund (Posts: 74; Member since: 01 Nov 2012)


No it needs 3.5 Ghz and 8GB of RAM plus 40MP Camera to be worth buying Where is my **** 50,000 mah battery?

Come on Samsung

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories