Adobe warns of a critical 'Zero-Day' Flash vulnerability
0. phoneArena posted on 15 Mar 2011, 16:52
Adobe has issued a security bulletin for the mobile and desktop versions of Adobe Flash, indicating that a Flash file, carried by an Excel email attachment, could crash your system, and give control over to the perpetrator...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. Yo (unregistered) posted on 15 Mar 2011, 17:01 4 2
Anyone that opens unknown email attachments deserves it. Should be common sense by now.
4. TheFunnyMan posted on 15 Mar 2011, 18:26 2 2
Agreed. If you dont know who, and you dont know what, then leave it alone.
29. ThePwnz (unregistered) posted on 16 Mar 2011, 15:19 0 0
Then again most people that do that are old people and don't know any better.
3. Sniggly posted on 15 Mar 2011, 18:03 4 4
So it's a virus written specifically to attack flash. Can't wait for the html5 virus.
7. taco50 (banned) posted on 15 Mar 2011, 19:40 3 3
You do realize that html5 works with android too right? Or are you so filled with hatred that you want something bad to happen to Apple even if it screws you over too?
9. Sniggly posted on 15 Mar 2011, 22:02 1 1
I know that it works with Android too, just like how Flash works with Macs. The virus won't affect me because I'm normally not dumb enough to get viruses.
My point is the BIG DEAL that Phonearena is making, and how they ONCE AGAIN make it an Apple vs. Android issue.
10. 530gemini posted on 16 Mar 2011, 00:27 0 1
This is a more of a widespread issue if you ask me compared to that light leakage on the ipad 2 that YOU made a big deal of.
My point is, you're so quick to blow up a small issue when it's about an Apple product, while you disregard a bigger issue when it's something that affects android.
11. Whateverman posted on 16 Mar 2011, 00:54 1 1
This is about Flash, not Android. Apple was only brought up because of how vocal SJ is about how he hates flash.
This its only an issue if you don't use your common sense when opening emails with strange attachments. Why does this too have to be another battle of the OS's?
13. 530gemini posted on 16 Mar 2011, 02:29 0 1
Read the article again. It does mention android devices.
Then let me reverse your logic back at you. Antennagate on the iphone4 is only an issue if you don't have common sense to hold it the right way :)
15. Sniggly posted on 16 Mar 2011, 02:36 0 0
Once again I call troll. "Holding the iPhone the right way" entails holding the damn thing differently than you would ever naturally hold a phone.
In simpler terms: people normally don't open suspicious email attachments, NOR do they hold their phone by the fingertips on the top, unless they are tremendously retarded. They might have had an excuse ten years ago, but they don't now. Almost anyone receiving and sending email knows about viruses and almost everyone knows which way to hold a phone.
So when are you going to give up the charade, Gemini?
17. 530gemini posted on 16 Mar 2011, 02:43 0 1
Oh and it's not natural to open your emails? What if it's an email from someone you know with an excel attachment? Isn't that possible?
Stop being a blind fandroid.
19. Sniggly posted on 16 Mar 2011, 08:00 0 0
You obviously don't understand how viruses work. Even if the email comes from your friend, if they have zero explanation for why they've sent you the attachment and/or you're not expecting one, why in the hell would you open it?
12. Sniggly posted on 16 Mar 2011, 02:15 0 0
Because, just like the issue with the pulled apps on the Android Market, this isn't an issue caused by a fundamental flaw on Android or any manufacturers' part. It's the result of someone deliberately sitting down and trying to create a problem for a large amount of users. The problem is multi platform, and yes it's a problem if you're an idiot when it comes to getting viruses (only two viruses in the years I've been operating electronics, thank you very much) but the issue will be swiftly solved and fade into the past.
On the OTHER hand, while Apple makes decent software that doesn't get infected often (because no one writes viruses for Apple software because NOONE USES IT) they have only had average overall handset reliability, and have been plagued by some major hardware issues. For instance, reception and call quality have always been a complaint among even the most glowing reviews; Antennagate; and now the issue with the iPad 2 leaking light. These are all problems related to the physical design of their hardware. And on the software side, who needs viruses when Apple's own updates brick customers' phones?
16. 530gemini posted on 16 Mar 2011, 02:39 0 1
This is a vulnerability issue. Geez Louisse, stop the blindness. You're quick to judge Jobs on not admitting issues, yet you are exactly doing the same thing here. There was an article here about hackers being able to break into iOS. Do you want me to refresh your memory of what you have posted on there? Coz it's pretty much caused by someone deliberately as well.
Apple devices don't get infected because Apple users are smarter, and are not cheap users like windows users who are downloading stuff from untrusted websites just to get apps or programs for free. Reception and call quality issues are not only known on the iphone. All phones have that issue. Name me a phone, and I'm sure I can pull something up. And again, the light leakage on the ipad2 is an isolated issue not present on all ipads, but of course you like readers to believe that it is. But sorry for you, when people go to the Apple Store to check the ipad out, it does not have light leakage :)
21. Sniggly posted on 16 Mar 2011, 09:42 0 0
Oh, you needn't remind me. "Whatever they were, it's hilarious that just as you publish five hundred articles about Google's security sucking, here we have a couple of yahoos who blew past the ipad's security." My attitude hasn't changed. I'm not here to single Apple out, as I recognize that anyone has issues. However, I don't like disproportionate coverage.
Apple users are smarter? Lol, okay. That's why Apple works so hard to make their UI as simple as possible. Motorola doesn't have many reception issues; in fact even their worst phones have been praised for reception and call quality.
And even if the light leakage is isolated, Antennagate isn't. I'm able to reproduce it easily every time I walk into an Apple store.
14. Sniggly posted on 16 Mar 2011, 02:31 0 0
To continue my rant: my gripe, once again, isn't that the iPhone is absolute crap. It's not. The iPhone did change the way we thought of smartphones. It gets credit for that and for being pretty and not completely horrible in the software arena. And for being easy to use.
My gripe is the attitude held by Apple and many of its fanboys. The attitude that every small thing they do to any product is treated like an ingenius innovation, even when it had been done before. This is due to Apple's marketing strategy, which has been incredibly effective. I also dislike how greedy Apple is; my indirect AT&T store makes four bucks off of any iPhone sold. We would also have to buy a 2600 dollar display for every one of our stores in order to showcase the iPhone. In fact, I hate how Apple works to knock any of its partners down and tries to dominate them. Just look at Verizon Wireless's website. The iPhone and iPad get their own categories under product lists. At no time before this did Verizon give similar respect to any flagship device. Also look at the reason behind Verizon's inability to launch the Thunderbolt; Apple wanted their iPhones sold.
I also despise the contempt with which Apple's end users are treated. Look at Antennagate, or the baby shaker fiasco. No apologies, no promise of compensation other than pulling the app days later or giving out free bumpers for a month. And acting like it's the fault of anyone who got the phone afterward that they didn't buy their phone during this grace period.
18. 530gemini posted on 16 Mar 2011, 02:52 0 1
Oh please. Before you pick on iphone users' attitude, you may want to look at yours first. And so what if we think that Apple devices features are innovative? They are. Yes, Apple did not invent zooming, or copy and paste, or video call, or web browsing, but it's the implementation of it that makes them innovative.
No one is forcing any store to sell the iphone. If they are not making any money out of it, I doubt if they would sell any Apple products. And if Apple is getting this much respect from anyone, it's because they deserve it. Why? Because they bring in the cash.
As for the antennagate again. That's a blown out of proportion issue. It's been proven over and over again that antennagate exists on all phones. Apple did tell all those who bought the iphone 4 TO RETURN it if they're not happy, for a full refund. Yet people still bought the iphone4. Why? Because it still is better than the rest :)
22. Sniggly posted on 16 Mar 2011, 10:00 0 1
Again, Apple has innovated in the past. They did a good job of putting the iPhone's software together. But when they said that the iPhone 4 "changed everything, again" I gagged. They haven't changed much about the iPhone since its inception except to add what was already lacking.
We don't sell Apple products unless the customer really insists. But that doesn't happen often.
Yes, Apple did do that. But how arrogant is it? "Nothing is wrong with our phones. If you don't like it, give it back." Still no apology whatsoever.
And the death grip is only present on any phone if you cover the antenna with your finger. All other manufacturers know to place this weak spot in a spot you don't normally cover with your hand. Apple wasn't. I know where the weak spot is on my X. And it sure as hell ain't where my hand normally is.
23. cellgeek82 posted on 16 Mar 2011, 10:22 0 0
We're going to have to put you two in a ring haha. Duke it out.
25. Sniggly posted on 16 Mar 2011, 10:48 0 0
That'll work. :)
26. protozeloz posted on 16 Mar 2011, 12:45 0 0
did someone said wedding..... thanks for pointing that out
27. ggman3 (banned) posted on 16 Mar 2011, 13:32 0 2
The real reason you bithc about Apple all the time is your store doesn't sell the iphone and you lose out on sales all the time. You always try to tell people how there are better phones and it rarely works so you've built up this hatred towards Apple. Don't be mad at the, be mad at your store for screwing you.
30. Sniggly posted on 16 Mar 2011, 15:23 1 0
I personally haven't even sold at this store yet, and the reason we don't push them is because the store makes a grand total of FOUR BUCKS off of them. We still sell them if the customer insists, though. For your information, the store chain is the largest in the region, with AT&T personally asking us to expand into other regions because we do so well.
And when I worked for Verizon I never had a single customer coming in to look for an iPhone who left without an Android phone. So your argument falls flat on its face, iFanboy. Suck it.
5. box (unregistered) posted on 15 Mar 2011, 18:35 1 3
what's with the steve jobs apple thing? The article clearly states this can attack apple computer systems... sure maybe not ifail/tampon but it was a wierd inclusion
6. Fanboys Suck posted on 15 Mar 2011, 18:48 4 1
Because Mr. Stevo doesn't allow flash on the iPhone... he said it has security issues.
20. TKFox007 posted on 16 Mar 2011, 08:57 1 0
When 10.1 came out, the head guy at Adobe said that Flash 10.1 was very secure. Then when it came out they said oh there's a security issue but were working on a patch to fix that. Now 10.2 is out and there's an issue all over again.
I'm getting tired of Flash having all these security issues, but sadly, it's a necessary evil as it's needed to see and use the internet to it's fullest. Is it really that hard to make it secure?
But I agree with every saying that people shouldn't be opening emails and downloading stuff from those emails from people they don't know.
24. Whateverman posted on 16 Mar 2011, 10:39 1 1
@ 530gemini. I think you are the one that needs to re-read this article. The mention of the Android OS was to advise what systems could be compermised by this virus, not to start another war. The mention of SJ was in reference to his anti-flash rant that was made public. So again, why does this have to be a pudding contest with you?
28. taco50 (banned) posted on 16 Mar 2011, 15:15 0 2
Actually it was sniggly that made it an issue with his comment about wanting an html5 virus which was directed towards Apple. Gemini was responding to that. You should complain about your buddy sniggly.
31. Sniggly posted on 16 Mar 2011, 15:25 0 0
I wonder if you even know the meaning of the word "facetious," Taco. I was commenting on how Phonearena themselves made the virus an Apple vs Android article.