x PhoneArena is looking for new authors in New York! To view all available positions, click here.
  • Options
    Close




AT&T now has 80% HSPA+ coverage

0. phoneArena 18 Nov 2010, 01:11 posted on

AT&T has expanded their HSPA+ network to 80% of their coverage map, but they are still only offering HSPA+ on USB modems, and holding their 4G marketing until their LTE rollout in mid-2011...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 18 Nov 2010, 02:15 1

1. clevername (Posts: 1428; Member since: 11 Jul 2008)


I think by not even acknowledging tmo's claims or counter-marketing sprints ads AT&T and VZW are dissing them pretty hard. Sending the message that "yeah we see you, but we don't care about insects".

posted on 18 Nov 2010, 03:07

2. Fanboykiller (unregistered)


Reporting over 4mbs down and 1.5mbs up here in Miami....!!!

posted on 18 Nov 2010, 03:54

3. JeffdaBeat (unregistered)


5.6mbps down and 1.63 up in Columbus, OH

posted on 18 Nov 2010, 06:35

4. no pity (unregistered)


The article is missing that the one carrier that has beat the rest (excluding sprint) is MetroPCS has already launched 4G LTE in many of their cities...being the one carrier that beat the rest to the 4G punch...i guess being no. 5 carrier doesn't warrant the mention...

posted on 18 Nov 2010, 08:40

5. Slammer (Posts: 1013; Member since: 03 Jun 2010)


This whole thing is a mess. The ITU has lost all control of the their definition over the carriers definition. Why even decide on a specified outline if no one is going to abide by it? Now that carriers have successfully began to mainstream the "4G" branded networks into the minds of millions of people, what can the ITU possibly do? Consumers are now under the impression of having something that isn't reality. Leave it to the wireless industry to smoke consumers just for profits.

My take is that, the ITU has placed most value on certain speeds to define 4G. Everything else being secondary.

In my opinion, a new generation network should be defined by advancements and capabilities within the technology. Third generation technology is almost maxed out. Other than speeds, It is almost impossible to try to expand on the platform. This is where Sprint, Verizon and MetroPCS should be able to qualify under a 4G platform.

When a new technology emerges that is capable of much more than the generation before it, shouldn't that be considered a new generation. While speeds may not be to what is defined, the capability to reach these speeds plus the secondary services and programs attached, should be considered.

Again, the ITU has defined the 4G platform. There is nothing my opinion or anyone else's can do about it. But it seems unfair that carriers spending billions of dollars on future technology to accommodate the next evolution in wireless, can't claim ownership to a 4G platform. It appears that T-mobile and AT&T don't have to spend the dollars others have spent yet they can still claim a next generation technology.

John B.

posted on 18 Nov 2010, 12:37 1

6. imkyle (Posts: 983; Member since: 18 Nov 2010)


5.7 Mbps down and 1.7 up in New Jersey.

posted on 18 Nov 2010, 20:13 1

8. jd829 (Posts: 155; Member since: 24 Feb 2010)


It's a jersey thing!

posted on 18 Nov 2010, 12:49

7. zerglisk (Posts: 544; Member since: 09 Feb 2010)


What's good with all that speed with a limited data plan... sigh
I would love to use AT&T only if it doesn't have a stupid 2GB limited plan.

Who knows, maybe in a few days AT&T will start claiming that they have largest 4G now, lol

posted on 01 Dec 2010, 18:54

9. cansler (Posts: 136; Member since: 07 Oct 2009)


Should'a kept your unlimited plan like I did. They forced it on me. Now I'm gonna force them to give it to me (as long as I can).

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories