AT&T employees get the memo and are pitching hard the Nokia Lumia 900
0. phoneArena posted on 20 Apr 2012, 03:29
Overall the reps praised the People tiles, simplicity of use and messaging, as well as the 8MP camera, fast LTE connectivity and good value for money ratio of the Lumia 900. It seems that AT&T employees have gotten the memo to make Nokia's first serious effort in the US for quite a while their true "hero" device, and if it indeed keeps selling on par with good Androids, the positive impact of Windows Phone handsets on Nokia's results might strengthen in Q2...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. sportsinger75 posted on 20 Apr 2012, 03:38 3 0
That's great to hear, but the fact of the matter is that AT&T still sells more iPhones than they do any other phone. I was in a corporate store the other day and the manager told me that the ratio of iPhones to other phones as far as sales go is about 9 to 1 (9 iPhone sales to 1 Android or WP7 sale). That's just plain abysmal and shows how much knowledge the general public has when it comes to other platforms. Or maybe it's just that people are more comfortable with a brand they know and love and can trust. Who knows...
2. tigermcm posted on 20 Apr 2012, 03:39 2 0
good news would be even better for me if everywhere at&t was mentioned we had Sprint instead. Oh Sprint why have you forsaken us?
3. iKavz posted on 20 Apr 2012, 04:05 6 0
So true. Not only in the US, also here in the Philippines. Nokia and MS really spent millions for this. Yesterday, 2 major carriers in the Philippines launched the Lumia 710 and 800. Nokia employees as well as carriers which exclusively sells Lumia devices are all trained how to market the device. They can answer all the questions correctly which is very surprising. Weeks ago they don't know a thing about it, now they are experts! Nice job for Nokia and MS.
4. eaxvac posted on 20 Apr 2012, 07:27 1 0
In my country, retailers are quite neutral about Windows Phone. They don't push it hard, nor do they say anything bad about it.
Just most of the people here wanted an iPhone out of the box without any recommendation. The iPhone has a 70% penetration out of the smartphone market here. Leaving 10% for Android and others mostly symbian/WP...
5. T00muchF00D posted on 20 Apr 2012, 09:43 5 0
People are oblivious when it comes to other platforms. My friend who knows nothing about technology tells me iPhone is the best and my WP7 is stupid. Her argument is "its stupid" and "wealthy people by iPhones". She did not mention anything about specifications, hardware, software, or anything. I told her (using facts, knowledge, and specs) why WP7 is better...she talked over me the whole time. This is not the first time this has happend to me. ill informed people want to say ill informed and fallow the rest of the herd since they are all iSheeps. Jesus could rock a WP7 device and they still wouldnt care.
10. waltah posted on 20 Apr 2012, 21:48 1 0
I find the "wealthy people" statement kinda funny. The 3GS is .99 and the iP4 is $99. Most new Android and WP devices cost more than the iPhone, but I guess it's still a "status symbol" somehow. Even though everyone's Grandma has one now.
8. aoikemono27 posted on 20 Apr 2012, 14:10 0 1
After reading about the Lumia 800 and now the 900 for half a year, I was not impressed when I finally went to the store and checked out a black and cyan Lumia 900. It had a good weight to it, but seemed bigger than it should be, especially with the square corners. The worst thing was the coating. It was this flaky cheap rubber coating that felt like it could rub off easily and was not pleasant to the touch. The coating also made the phone feel mushy. I had imagined it would be smooth, cool, and hard, something premium. This was not the case. The screen wasn't any better than the Focus S next to it, and the phone much thicker with a worse camera. Performance, of course, matters little on a Windows Phone since even the cheapest model will perform the same.
I would still choose the iPhone for build quality, luxury, and premium quality. You really can't beat that glass body and heavy metal rim. Even the buttons don't have the same poor quality and wiggle of these o ther phones. They are just super tight, clicky, and wiggle free.
Specs are meaningless. If you can't even pass these basic first impression non-techie demonstrations of quality, who cares what lies underneath?
Nokia and Microsoft are just selling a mediocre phone at a loss. They may be trying to grow the userbase and Windows Phone platform, but the hardware itself is the opposite of tempting. There are plenty of older, free on contract Windows Phones that are not selling well, and they are just as tempting and just as fast as the Lumia. They should just give everyone a free Lumia, with all the money they are already blowing on advertisements and employee incentives.