AT&T details 2008 phone lineup
0. phoneArena posted on 18 Sep 2008, 13:35
In a leaked document, AT&T details phone launches, pushes the Bold back to November...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
38. ME (unregistered) posted on 21 Sep 2008, 16:55 0 0
even if verizon doesnt get alltel, at the rate theyre going they will definitly catchup to at&t soon
17. (unregistered) posted on 18 Sep 2008, 20:18 0 0
You know whats really funny? ATT claims they are the best with global coverage VZW has coverage in 195 destinations while ATT has coverage in 196 Lol think about that one
25. vzw fanboy (unregistered) posted on 19 Sep 2008, 15:55 0 0
more 3g=more features, no matter what phone you have at&t ppl.
27. (unregistered) posted on 19 Sep 2008, 20:40 0 0
Actually 850mhz is better for building and land penetration. AT&T owns more 1900mhz spectrum though. Verizon uses both 800mhz and 1900mhz, while Sprint relies on 1900mhz only. (Hence why it used to be called Sprint PCS, PCS=1900mhz).
35. (unregistered) posted on 21 Sep 2008, 09:33 0 0
Let me just comment...You all have great points. Sprint - poor coverage and costumer service, great phones offered at reasonable prices, inexpensive plans. Verizon-in the US has excellent coverage hands down, okay customer service, fairly decent phones offered but very expensive plans. AT&T- fairly decent coverage, good customer service, fairly decent phones and plans offered. They all have some pro's & con's, it just depends on what's important to you in the grand scheme of things...cost, coverage or product. I've tried Sprint-hated it! AT&T no major complaints, thought about switching to Verizon but the plans are too expensive as well as the phones. IT'S ALL A PERSONAL PREFERENCE!
39. assnonymous (unregistered) posted on 22 Sep 2008, 04:42 0 0
att plans are verizon clones lol so how are they more expensive
40. (unregistered) posted on 22 Sep 2008, 09:36 0 0
#43 is right.. VZW and ATT have the same rate plans at the same prices. and idk why everyone needs to bash everyone else. Everyone just admit to yourselves that (as stated in comment #42) every single company has its pros and cons. Its all about preference and where u live. I have ATT because it has the best reception where i live. If i lived out in maine or upstate NY i would probably have VZW, so its just on preference and what suits u best. So stop bashing eachother(FANBOYS) and enjoy ur cell serivice.
45. A. B. (unregistered) posted on 27 Sep 2008, 15:51 0 0
What are you talking about? Verizon's coverage is terrible in my area, and I live in a metropolitan area that is one of the largest 20 cities in the US...
