ARM CEO: by 2014, mobile devices will be powerful but consume less energy
0. phoneArena 26 Apr 2013, 11:05 posted on
ARM CEO Warren East said in an interview that the company's big.LITTLE technology will allow powerful mobile devices to hit the market by next year, but these devices will use much less power than today's current models; East said he is not surprised that Samsung was able to ship a big.LITTLE supported device this year, although not all versions of the Samsung Galaxy S4 are being powered by the octa-core Samsung Exynos 5 processor...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. xperiaDROID (banned) (Posts: 5629; Member since: 08 Mar 2013)
Cool! This is the best INNOVATION!
Mr. East, you and your company is the best! Love you all!
9. xperiaDROID (banned) (Posts: 5629; Member since: 08 Mar 2013)
It's not cool, it's not hot, it's COOL SPICY HOT!!! :)
2. gustavoace (Posts: 173; Member since: 13 Nov 2012)
I think the same about this news and whatever apple announces..
You'd really expected to have less powerfull devices consuming more energy?
12. chocolaking (Posts: 494; Member since: 22 May 2012)
I think exactly the same thing as you said.
isn't it the trend already for the past 10 year for consuming less energy on everything thing?
3. TheBitterTruth (unregistered)
Its obvious. Everybody knows that.
4. metal (Posts: 11; Member since: 26 Dec 2012)
Well this is shocking isn't that what they are supposed to do in the first place???
5. KaiTech (Posts: 20; Member since: 20 Mar 2012)
"The company licenses its IP to customers and West says that ARM succeeds by talking to customers and its customers' cusatomers to better serve the markets it covers. "
So who is Mr. West? :D
6. sharks (Posts: 230; Member since: 16 Feb 2013)
Is it Mr. East or Mr. West?? I've seen both mentioned in this article and oddly it seemed like they were the same person. Is there any implied direction to this article? Pun intended.
7. darac (Posts: 2156; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
Just wait to see the Exynos 6 with 3Ghz Cortex A50 based octa monster.. consuming less power than today's chips, thanks to 14nm process.
Oh and who is West? Bahahhaha
23. MistB (Posts: 581; Member since: 07 Jul 2012)
Galaxy Note 4 or Galaxy Mega 6.5 (the successor to the Galaxy Mega 6.3) will most likely carry the A57/A53 64 bit processors seeing as they will be big enough to house those gargantuan batteries for excessive multi tasking. I have a feeling the GS5 is heading down the route of being the mainstream phone with practicality and innovations being put before power, no doubt it will be powerful but i've a feeling Samsung created the new Mega line to eventually be the models that will carry those insane specs we've always wanted, I mean the 6.3 is the only phone to carry the powerful exynos 5250 chipset, pity about the RAM and screen res!
10. akki20892 (Posts: 3899; Member since: 04 Feb 2013)
7.5" 4K screen (unbreakable screen even 10 tons steel fall on),
12,000mAh (2 Months Battery Life) + Solar Charging,
intel i7 octacore, 8GB RAM, 3TB Storage,
LTE 5GB download speed, and 550MB upload speed,
72MP Main Camera, 12MP Front Camera,
HDMI USB Ports, SD Card Slot,
Unbreakable Bullet Proof body (even 10 tons steel fall on or can't break even RPG hit).
Dream Phone Hell Yeah.......lol
14. xperiaDROID (banned) (Posts: 5629; Member since: 08 Mar 2013)
Wow, your dream phone will probably be released in the year 2100, I guess......
19. MistB (Posts: 581; Member since: 07 Jul 2012)
It's probably what we'll be using in 2023, or something close to that if phones/tablets (phone will have transformed into a truly flexible transparent hybrid tablet device by this time) haven't become integrated into our bodies/eyes by then.
24. MistB (Posts: 581; Member since: 07 Jul 2012)
I get a thumbs down for that? What kind of sensitive children do we have on phonearena?
25. Nathan_ingx (Posts: 3605; Member since: 07 Mar 2012)
The ones who doesn't want to move on to 2023, who doesn't have a sense of humor and imagination, i guess...
32. xperiaDROID (banned) (Posts: 5629; Member since: 08 Mar 2013)
Because they don't want to move on to 2023, like what Nathan said? If they don't want to move on to 2023, how can they move on to 2100?
Oh wait, I wonder where we will be in 2100..........
16. ebubekir26 (Posts: 313; Member since: 21 Dec 2012)
you went full retard,
never go full retard
31. Dingy_cellar_dweller (Posts: 237; Member since: 16 Mar 2013)
"2 Months Battery Life"
Your shooting a little low, the power should last the life of the product and never need charging.
17. HildyJ (Posts: 292; Member since: 11 Aug 2012)
This isn't news, this is advertising. Sure ARM chips are getting faster and using less power. So are Intel's x86 chips (which is not mentioned).
It's just Moore's law - processing power doubles periodically and if you build a chip that only multiplies it by 1.5, you get more power and less power consumption. How much you increase power and cut consumption is a tradeoff but the trend will always be towards more power with less consumption.
20. HDShatter (Posts: 1021; Member since: 17 Jan 2013)
Intels phone chips are much more powerful than arms per core. A quad core intel baytrail being released this year is expected to score 50000+ in Antutu.
22. a_merryman (Posts: 749; Member since: 14 Dec 2011)
Can't wait to see some windows 8 hybrids come out with that chip, will probably get one.
33. taikucing (unregistered)
I think ARM is the future. Although it is RISC based, it needs few clock cycles to execute an instruction. Intel still wins because its architecture is mature and has much more transistors, and developed in many decades ago, while ARM is still new. So, give a chance to ARM ;)
GPU has more processing power than CPU with the same transistor count, but it only does specific jobs.
AMD Radeon 4870 has 950 million transistors, and its processing power reaches 1 teraflops. For comparison, Intel core i7 980X 6 cores CPU with its 1.1 billion transistors only reaches 120 Gigaflops.
So, by making transitor count of ARM CPU as much as Intel CPU, I think ARM will surpass intel.
For example, to match the transistor count of Intel CPU, ARM should be 8 cores while intel is still 2 cores. It doesn't matter if ARM needs more cores to match Intel just like what GPU does. Radeon 4870 has 800 SPU (cores).
The more cores, the more multitasking jobs it can do, the more processing power it can produce. It's the processing power-to-transistor count ratio that matters, so let ARM make the same amount of transistors of Intel ;)
That's why today some people prefer using GPU rather than CPU to do a job that needs brutal power, like researching or cracking passwords. And there is a rumor that some people wants to make ARM as server CPUs. I wonder why they want to do that because there are already good CPU like intel Xeon. Only god and experts know why they want to make ARM for servers. Probably they know the power behind it if they can pair ARM CPU with GPU in the servers & supercomputers ;)
21. HDShatter (Posts: 1021; Member since: 17 Jan 2013)
I wonder how much better the battery life will be on the exynos 5 chip than the snapdragon 600. I have yet to see one test of the exynos 5.
26. Nathan_ingx (Posts: 3605; Member since: 07 Mar 2012)
Don't you think the Exynos5 will have more advantage, tests aside?
The acclaimed big.LITTLE architeciture is meant to save power while not compromising on the performance, and if there's minimal difference compared to Snapdragon 600, it'll be a disappointment.