x We have placed cookies on your device to make your experience better. Find more info here.
x PhoneArena.com наема във Варна! Ако технологиите са в кръвта ти и имаш перфектен писмен английски,
ние ти даваме възможността да станеш част от екипа ни. - виж повече
  • Options
    Close




3DMark Android Edition now available, let the benchmarking begin!

0. phoneArena 02 Apr 2013, 09:39 posted on

Looks like we have a new major entry in the Android benchmark field - Futuremark has released 3DMark Android Edition! The new benchmark tool will let you test your mobile device's performance and compare it with results of other devices, including ones powered by iOS and Windows...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 02 Apr 2013, 09:59 14

1. R-vjn (Posts: 164; Member since: 07 Jan 2013)


Proud of my LG Google Nexus 4..!

posted on 02 Apr 2013, 11:26 2

15. darac (Posts: 2156; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)


Well, Nexus 5 is still packing the latest Qualcomm GPU, while not having a 1080p display.

And the result shows

posted on 02 Apr 2013, 12:50 1

19. downphoenix (Posts: 2372; Member since: 19 Jun 2010)


yea pretty good but the HTC One still outperforms overall. The 1 frame a second loss is worth the more advanced physics.

posted on 02 Apr 2013, 15:23

20. OGman (Posts: 10; Member since: 26 Oct 2012)


The Nexus beat the One in graphics and One beat the Nexus in physics...I wouldn't say it necessarily outperforms it. Plus the Nexus 4 is almost 6 months old. Props to LG and google for making a beast that still competes.

posted on 02 Apr 2013, 22:45

23. HäckeMáte (Posts: 168; Member since: 28 Feb 2012)


I have a Galaxy Nexus and i get this message in the play store: "your device isnt compatible with this version"

damn you android :( whats the point in having a Nexus

posted on 02 Apr 2013, 17:49

21. rgxVOiD (Posts: 435; Member since: 30 Aug 2012)


I wish i have a Nexus 4 :(
They don't sell it here where I live, thank god Im moving next year

posted on 02 Apr 2013, 10:04

2. dickwyn (Posts: 601; Member since: 07 May 2012)


very big download file, still downloading it...

posted on 02 Apr 2013, 10:05 4

3. Neurone (Posts: 54; Member since: 05 Mar 2013)


How come note 2 scores only 9 points and s3 scores 26.7.....! while note 2 has better graphic chip than s3

posted on 02 Apr 2013, 10:24 2

8. imkyle (Posts: 1013; Member since: 18 Nov 2010)


The Note II uses the Mali 400 same as the Galaxy S III international version. The Mali is still a beast when it comes to graphics. They used the 400 in the S II back in 2011 so its still hanging in there.

posted on 02 Apr 2013, 10:31 2

9. Neurone (Posts: 54; Member since: 05 Mar 2013)


ok Mali 400 on both....agreed
but why big discrepency in points on benchmark sheet?

posted on 02 Apr 2013, 10:40 1

12. imkyle (Posts: 1013; Member since: 18 Nov 2010)


That is odd as both are clocked at 440mHz and have the same screen resolution.

posted on 02 Apr 2013, 11:15 1

14. naveenstuns (Posts: 172; Member since: 19 Feb 2012)


It has something to do with Mali 400 as even low end devices like xperia u uses that GPU.

posted on 02 Apr 2013, 10:35

11. imkyle (Posts: 1013; Member since: 18 Nov 2010)


My Nexus 4 may not be so obsolete as some have been thinking :)

posted on 02 Apr 2013, 10:05 4

4. xperator (Posts: 8; Member since: 14 Jul 2012)


I would like to see Galaxy S4 in that list.

Plz update your results with latest flagships added. Wanna compare One with them.

posted on 02 Apr 2013, 10:09 1

5. k4j98 (Posts: 60; Member since: 12 Jul 2012)


I'll assume the Optimus G performs the same as the Nexus 4 so I don't have to test it out myself. Cool.

posted on 02 Apr 2013, 10:12 1

6. yyuu1000 (Posts: 152; Member since: 26 Jul 2012)


nice job nexus 4

posted on 02 Apr 2013, 10:21 1

7. rojiblanko (Posts: 18; Member since: 14 Oct 2011)


same here! proud of my Google Nexus 4!

posted on 02 Apr 2013, 10:32 2

10. BadAssAbe (Posts: 434; Member since: 22 Apr 2011)


Nexus 4 ($350) vs HTC ONE ($A LOT MORE)
Tie
LOL

posted on 02 Apr 2013, 11:05 2

13. baldilocks (Posts: 540; Member since: 14 Dec 2008)


Looks like this has a lot of bugs in it. Especially older phones scoring much higher than newer phones with better graphics chips.

posted on 02 Apr 2013, 12:19

16. s.mrabet (Posts: 117; Member since: 26 Oct 2011)


283 mb is just a little too much for a benchmarking tool..

posted on 02 Apr 2013, 19:18 1

22. HDShatter (Posts: 1021; Member since: 17 Jan 2013)


283 mb is a lot more accurate than egypt and quadrant... That benchmark actually uses what modern phone games look like.

posted on 02 Apr 2013, 12:25

17. CanYouSeeTheLight (Posts: 885; Member since: 05 Jul 2012)


People saying that the benchmark is flawed because older devices score more than newer ones please take in mind the difference in resolution, that's why the s600 in the one is scoring almost the same as the nexus 4 because it is pushing full hd instead of hd, and the diference in the galaxy s3's score and the note 2's score is because the galaxy s3 in question is the Qualcomm s4 and not the exynos and it seems the adreno is better in that test.

posted on 02 Apr 2013, 12:41 1

18. Neurone (Posts: 54; Member since: 05 Mar 2013)


your points makes sense, they should mention these intricate details, otherwise people would be biased....

posted on 03 Apr 2013, 07:53

24. Thanthea (Posts: 9; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)


The Note 2 is using an older GPU and a 32nm a9 quad core processor while the nexus 4 is using a quad core 28 nm partial a15 processor paired with a modern adreno 320 GPU. Of course it's going to beat the note 2.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories