28 Jun 2008

Finally, someone with some sense around here.

28 Jun 2008

137. The Prada was not the first touch-screen phone. They have been around for quite a while now. You obviously have no idea what you're talking about. Go find something better to do. This website is not about the phone carrier but about the phone itself. AT&T may suck, but that doesn't mean the iPhone does.

28 Jun 2008

The speeds of the Dare may beat the iPhone (possibly the iPhone 3G), but the phone itself is far from being nearly as good a phone as the iPhone . After a few weeks of using the Dare you will probably get tired of it like I did with my Voyager...let's just face it, Manufacturers are just trying to copy the iPhone (and it's not working). This one I will have to say is, by far, the closest any phone has ever come to the iPhone (I don't care what they say about the Instinct). But there are bound to be glitches and downfalls to this phone very often. Why? Because this phone only took 6 months (tops) to create. Whereas the iPhone took 2 and a half years to create (even it had some things to fix!). Bottom line is this: If these so called "iPhone killers" are going to even be worthy of being compared to the iPhone they need to 1. Have more time taken to create them. 2. Be a smart-phone. and 3. Have a LARGE touch-screen (more than 3 inches). Is this so hard to accomplish? It is in a matter of months. If someone out there would just take more time upon planning these phone's they would actually be pretty cool. If you plan on buying this phone because you think it's better than the iPhone, all I have to say is: I warned you.

27 Jun 2008

If no one needed it then why was it created? Not everyone has Wi-Fi! Duh.

27 Jun 2008

I really wasn't to siked about this phone. The iPhone 3G is much better.

27 Jun 2008

So basically you just said "Sprint doesn't have the best data network." Hello, data needs a good signal. Oh, and I'm Trevor widger, I just signed in.