Sony Ericsson C902 Preview

User comments

Show only comments with rating All comments -10 and up -5 and up 0 and up 5 and up 10 and up Display mode Threaded Chronological Show all replies

0

1. anonymous @ 19 April, 2008 06:35:58 AM

wt about the pic quality as i wanr to compare it with n82

Reply to this comment View 0 replies to this comment

Reply to anonymous Hide 0 replies to this comment

0

2. Swedish cock sucker @ 14 May, 2008 04:28:25 PM

Any photo samples? What is the picture quality?!?!?! Read dozen C902 reviews and no photo samples, why?

Reply to this comment View 0 replies to this comment

Reply to Swedish cock sucker Hide 0 replies to this comment

0

3. anonymous @ 30 November, 2008 05:15:07 AM

I have been a fan of sony-ericsson phones for a very long time, my last 6+ phones have been SE's but after purchasing this phone (and a brief experience with the c702 which is equally disappointing) I no longer hold SE phone in such high regard

Good
looks cool
slim

Bad
interface is slower than older models (such as my old k 610i) - probably due to unnecessarly fancy pictures at the expense of useability
mp3/radio player is clunky due to reduced external buttons

really bad - THE CAMERA!
- the camera is a shocker, it was the main reason I spent so much on this phone - for a "cybershot" camera the picture quality in anything other than perfect lighting conditions is terrible.
the flash is gutless and not much better than a much cheaper camera phone with light
there is no point in using the camera in anything more than 1mp mode for above quality issues
camera interface is overly complicated - with too many "automatic/intelligent" features that slow down use, SE should have just made the flash better, decreased the mp of the camera and thrown away the bloated camera software - a simple interface with the ability to have flash always on would have been far better

if you never want to use the camera other than in full sunlight, probably a good phone, otherwise owning a C902 is like having a 1000hp car that needs to refuel every 1km, nice on paper but in reality very disappointing

Reply to this comment View 0 replies to this comment

Reply to anonymous Hide 0 replies to this comment

Post comment