Reviews icon Samsung U100 Ultra 5.9 Review

Samsung U100 Ultra 5.9 Review

Published on: 06 July, 2007 by PhoneArena Team

Performance:

As you have noticed, the U100 is very slim, and very elegant, but in order to be reduced the size, some features are cut, some are with reduced quality. As you cannot put large display on a small phone, it is hard to put strong antenna in a phone that small and slim. In our test for reception level, the U100 scores the lowest results among the Ultra series, and one of the lowest ever. We rate it 2 out of 10, which means that if you are in a fringe area, consider other phone with stronger reception.

But if you have strong signal will experience superb sound quality, which seems to be typical for Samsung phone, even thin ones. The microphone does excellent job for the voice conversations and deliver strong sound, realistic and crystal clear, but with a minor decrease in the high-frequencies of the voices. The incoming sound is stronger and the voices sound very realistic. We definitely like how the U100 sounds in both directions.


Conclusion:

If you are on the market, searching for SLIM phone – this is the phone you should look at. Keep in mind it is tri-band only, and is not fully usable in the States. The slimmest phone in the world, this one is way slimmer than rival models of other manufacturers, like the SLVR of Motorola for example. Still, Samsung has managed to pack a decent browser and camera (plus camcorder) and nice functionality, but we are sorry some of its features (like the Phonebook) are older version with less functionality than the new ones (that of U700). Still, one should compromise for the slim and sexy design of the U100, which is worth it.

Pros

  • Slimmest on the market
  • Usable keyboard, way better than the one of U700 and U300
  • Solid construction, although very thin

Cons

  • Tri-band means it won’t be fully usable in America
  • Camera lacks autofocus and flash
  • Lack of memory Card slot limits you to the internal memory

PAppeal

Christian Dior:
9 of 10
Very high

This phone will be bought by people who want to show off how thin it is

Average Joe:
5 of 10
Average

You like that it is thin and that have 3-megapixel camera

Corporate US:
1 of 10
Very low

Slim, but cannot do any work

High-Tech junkie
1 of 10
Very low

You would prefer looking at high-end cameraphones and smartphones

expand ratings

PA phone rating

  • Design 9
    • Build Quality 9
    • Look 9
  • Display 6
    • Quality 8
    • Resolution 5
    • Size 6
  • Camera 8
    • Resolution 10
    • Quality 4
    • Features, Comfort 10
  • Sound Quality 8
    • Incoming 8.5
    • Outgoing 8.5
    • Signal Reception 2
  • Connectivity 5
    • Local 5
    • Internet 7
    • Data 5
  • Multimedia 6
    • Interface Comfort, Options 7.5
    • Quality 6
    • Supported formats 5
    • Connectors (3.5/A2DP) 6
  • Organizer 6.5
    • PIM 7
    • Phonebook 5.5
    • Messaging 8
Good
7
out of 10
advertisment:
Email this review to a friend









Subscribe

If you'd like to stay informed about news and reviews we have published, related to the following categories, please select the ones of interest to you and enter your e-mail.





 
 

Comments icon User comments

User comments

Be the first one to post a comment

  Total: 0 post(s)
Post comment

Post comment


  • *Please register/login, to be able to edit your comment and to get your name and e-mail fields
    automatically populated. HTML is not allowed.
    Any content submitted to PhoneArena, becomes the sole property of PhoneArena and cannot be used in parts or in whole without PhoneArena’s consent. All such content expresses the views and opinions of their authors and PhoneArena will not be held responsible for any offensive or racist materials posted.
Generated for: 0.0345