Nokia N96 US Reviews Nokia logo

Nokia N96 US Reviews

Av. User Rating

Average User Rating

Design
4.7
46.92308%
Features
5
50%
Performance
4.4
43.84615%
Average
4.7
out of 10

Based on 13 opinions






Sort user reviews by:

11.

29 Sep 2008 by Anonymous

36.7%3.7out of 10

i can't help but say that this is a waste of money. the battery really really blows. it doesn't last. and i tried so much to extend it. this phone guzzles all the juice in its battery pack. and plus it's slow so that makes it even more annoying.





5 megapixel cam
dual cam (video call XD )
screen is bright and big
buttons are annoying
screen get scratched too easily
i get some strange static noises from time to time
the receiver could've been louder

Spam report

Here, you can report this due to offensive language, spam or advertisements.

 
Was this review helpful? YesNo
8 out of 9 people found this review helpful.

12.

27 Sep 2008 by Anonymous

16.7%1.7out of 10

garbage garbage garbage. and more garbage from your one and only nokia. the mp3 player is slow and the talk time is low, this phone is all show and no go. this phone is not the best bang for your buck. i think it's worth a good 300$ no more and that's without contract. the picture quality is garbage, i mean older phones take better pictures. my previous motorola did a better job too.
this is quite a half phone it gives everything in one little device and everything that's in it does a half job. i mean why bother making some thing like this in the first place. why not just make something that does the job right.


i get irritating static sounds from the receiver and the microphone doesn't do a good job capting my voice (i speak loud enough, so loud everyone looks at me as if i'm yelling)





the phone works
the phone works..........for a limited time
battery is bad, and the dual led flash isn't that great compared my xenon on my k790.
picture quality= bad
phone = slow slow slow, so very slow

it doesn't fit comfortably in your hand

Spam report

Here, you can report this due to offensive language, spam or advertisements.

 
Was this review helpful? YesNo
8 out of 10 people found this review helpful.

13. same as N95

27 Sep 2008 by Anonymous

20%2out of 10

i must say that this phone is not great. nokia still has the same problems in it that they have in the N95. this is disappointing. Nokia is one of the worst phone makers ever, they fail to acknowledge issues that customers report to them. i paid hefty cash for another piece of s**t made by No-f-ing-kia. once again they make asses of themselves.





dual flash gives a bit better lighting compared to single flash.
the stand that they attached to the camera makes ok for watching videos.
slides a bit more smoothly, than N95
gaming is ok
receiver still gives great static
receiver volume is still poor.
phone tends to restart on itself just like the N95
BATTERY DOESN'T LAST LONG.
BATTERY INDICATOR STILL FLAWED
pictures still grainy
mp3 lacks bass
bulky phone
music keys sometimes don't respond very well
phone is slow
screen gets scratched way too easily
phone carries same problems as n95, because nokia just never wanted to get around fixing them
phone is way too costly for its disgusting performance

Spam report

Here, you can report this due to offensive language, spam or advertisements.

 
Was this review helpful? YesNo
13 out of 16 people found this review helpful.
Post review
Generated for: 0.0368