advertisement:
Shops icon
Shops
Shops
Reviews icon
Nokia 7500 Prism Review
Conclusion:
We were left with the impression that this phone is for the lovers of the attractive design or, rather, shape. The appearance of the device is what attracts, but, nevertheless, Nokia did not miss the main things for a modern device – camera, music and video player. If you are looking for a phone for taking photos and, as a whole, for a multimedia device, you can quietly pass by it because it is not designated to satisfy such needs. The fact that the device is a 3-band one (having 2 frequency options) limits its use worldwide.
If you want something different, which attracts glances, and thus to show that you are different, this is the phone for you.
PA rating
Nokia 7500 Prism Review
Published on: 14 August, 2007 by PhoneArena Team
Performance:
The telephone works relatively quickly, but is slower than the 8600 LUNA, for example. The time from pressing a main menu button to opening of the sub-menus is half a second.
The melodies of incoming calls are relatively loud, and can be heard even in a noisy environment. Nevertheless, if you are in a very noisy place, it is preferable to use the vibration option.
We would set the strength of the signal reception during conversation to 6.5 of 10, which is relatively good, as a whole, and much better in comparison to that of 8600 Luna, for example. During conversation the sound that you hear is above the average, as voices sound unrealistically without low and high tones, but, on the other side, the situation is a bit better – they hear you louder and realistically, but without high tones.
By official data of the manufacturer, the phone endures 2.8 hours in a taking regime, which is a short time in comparison to the average or up to 280 hours in a standby regime.
The melodies of incoming calls are relatively loud, and can be heard even in a noisy environment. Nevertheless, if you are in a very noisy place, it is preferable to use the vibration option.
We would set the strength of the signal reception during conversation to 6.5 of 10, which is relatively good, as a whole, and much better in comparison to that of 8600 Luna, for example. During conversation the sound that you hear is above the average, as voices sound unrealistically without low and high tones, but, on the other side, the situation is a bit better – they hear you louder and realistically, but without high tones.
By official data of the manufacturer, the phone endures 2.8 hours in a taking regime, which is a short time in comparison to the average or up to 280 hours in a standby regime.
Conclusion:
We were left with the impression that this phone is for the lovers of the attractive design or, rather, shape. The appearance of the device is what attracts, but, nevertheless, Nokia did not miss the main things for a modern device – camera, music and video player. If you are looking for a phone for taking photos and, as a whole, for a multimedia device, you can quietly pass by it because it is not designated to satisfy such needs. The fact that the device is a 3-band one (having 2 frequency options) limits its use worldwide.
If you want something different, which attracts glances, and thus to show that you are different, this is the phone for you.
Pros
- Memorable and original design
- Good display
Cons
- Slow when taking photos
- Hard to press joystick and volume keys
- Tri-band
PA rating 
- Good
- out of 10
Latest Articles
news icon
Latest Articles
Latest Articles
- Differences between iPhone and BlackBerry owners
- Telus to offer BlackBerry Storm2?
- Peter Chou launches HTC HD2, insults iPhone and calls Microsoft HTC's Strongest Partner
- Dell Mini 3iX visits the Feds, passes the test with AT&T 3G frequencies on board
- Sears offering $50 discount to buy DROID
- Ernie and Bert wave hello as Google puts DROID ad on home page
- HTC Hero takes on DROID Eris in battle for the ages
Home page
News
Reviews
Phones (all)
Carriers (all)
Forum
Phone filter
Compare
User comments
Post comment