Home page
News
Reviews
Phones (all)
Carriers (all)
Forum
Glossary
Phone filter
Compare
- Home
- ›
- Nokia phones
- ›
- Nokia 6555 Reviews
Nokia 6555 Reviews
5 Oct 2007
Nokia 6555 Review
AT&T mid-level clamshell
So, is the 6555 a great multipurpose phone at the end? Well, yes. Okay, so it may not get any awards or attract you from that iPhone or BlackBerry but that’s not what its goal is. The 6555 is there to get you through the day and still provide you with plenty of features in case you find yourself without say your MP3 player, internet connection, or camera. When you consider its price low price, the deal seems that much better...
- Good
- out of 10
1. shadow
10 Oct 2008 by shadow
60%6out of 10
Looked like a great phone, but then it started turning off by itself, getting voice mails for calls I never got, and frequently get network busy when I try to make a call.
Spam reportHere, you can report this due to offensive language, spam or advertisements.
2.
25 Aug 2008 by Bill
80%8out of 10
Good phone for the money. I have had it for 8 months now and have no complaints. I have experienced random calls going direct to voicemail, with no indication of a missed call like some others have reported. but this has only happened 2-3 times. Took this phone to Turkey on vacation and it worked very well there too. In my opinion this is a great phone for the average phone user, who does not require some of the fancier features on more high end phones.
Spam reportHere, you can report this due to offensive language, spam or advertisements.
3.
13 Jun 2008 by Anonymous
70%7out of 10
I'm now on my second Nokia 6555. My first one worked perfectly for 3 months after my Lg cg300 died after having it for a year and a half. I mean I dropped it a few times and didn't have any scratches plus it still worked. Since I'm a heavy texter, the batter life didn't last that long for me but that was ok as long as I wasn't out somewhere and needed it for an emergency. However one night it decided to not work anymore...I couldn't call out or recieve anything, so I had to send it back and got a new one. The new one is horrible; a few of my friends tried calling me and their calls went straight to my voicemail...I don't know what is wrong with it. I'm going to send it back. I like the looks of the phone, but it isn't the most reliable.
Spam reportHere, you can report this due to offensive language, spam or advertisements.
4. It sucks!!!
8 May 2008 by michelle
48%4.8out of 10
This is the worst phone I have ever had. I have had four within five months. That's because AT&T keeps sending me a new one. They all keep turning off by themself or showing a blank screen. Do not waste your time and money on this phone. It is not worth it.
Spam reportHere, you can report this due to offensive language, spam or advertisements.
5. Ryan
18 Apr 2008 by Ryan
90%9out of 10
I have had this phone for about 6 months and it has been a great phone. I work in the industry and I know there a few things that contribute to the complaints about battery life (bad signal, etc) Phone is great.
Spam reportHere, you can report this due to offensive language, spam or advertisements.
6. sucky phone
31 Mar 2008 by jason
10%1out of 10
Poor battery sucky everything! i want my money back
Spam reportHere, you can report this due to offensive language, spam or advertisements.
7. this phone sucks
31 Mar 2008 by Dakota
10%1out of 10
I have had the phone for about 4 months. It turns off by its self all the time and it blinks a black screen alot! its sucks bad!
Spam reportHere, you can report this due to offensive language, spam or advertisements.
8. BUMMER!
23 Feb 2008 by Chester
32%3.2out of 10
Got this phone cuz I needed a new one in a hurry after I lost my other cell phone. I thought it looked good and I was told it had 7 hours of talk time and over 10 days of standby time. Had no reason not to believe it would not be a good phone since I had a Nokia a few years ago.But the battery life is too short and not a lot of talk time, even after I had the cell store exchange the phone.Now Iam stuck with it for 2 years.
Spam reportHere, you can report this due to offensive language, spam or advertisements.
9. yukky battery
23 Feb 2008 by Megan
32%3.2out of 10
i agree! mine won't stay charged either. i wish i had just kept my old sony ericcson and replaced the battery. at the att store they wanted $50.00 for a new battery 4 my sony, so they talked me into this nokia for $100.00 with a $50.00 rebate so i went for it. bad decision!!! the sony ericcsonbattery is only $20.00 on-line. the nokia is a good looking phone but the battery is horrible with no more than 1 hour of talk time. i also wish att would take this phone off the market or recall it.
Spam reportHere, you can report this due to offensive language, spam or advertisements.
10. Stay Away - Terrible battery life
23 Feb 2008 by Jesse
36%3.6out of 10
I've had this phone since the end of December 2007 and had the battery replaced in the first one I bought because it wouldn't hold a charge. After the battery was replaced the Nokia 6555 STILL would not keep a charge for more than a couple days. Finally I had my first phone replaced with another Nokia 6555 (stupid me). The new unit won't hold a charge. I can't help but notice that I am not the only person to experience the difficulties that come with keeping this phone charged. It looks good and has many useful features, but that doesn't do me any good if it is always connected to the charger, Nokia definitely dropped the ball on this model. My old Motorola flip phone that I bought in 1995 held a better charge than this one does! Now I am faced with having to pay full price for a new cell phone that I can rely on. Any suggestions?
Spam reportHere, you can report this due to offensive language, spam or advertisements.
Average User Rating
Based on 22 opinions