Motorola VU204 Reviews Motorola logo

Motorola VU204 Reviews

Av. User Rating

Average User Rating

Design
6.3
62.5%
Features
5.3
52.5%
Performance
4.8
47.5%
Average
5.4
out of 10

Based on 4 opinions






Sort user reviews by:

1.

24 Sep 2009 by Anonymous

36.7%3.7out of 10

this phone is very cheaply made and the hinge broke after three months of use so I lost the screen and can only hear through speakerphone. the side volume buttons also fell off





Spam report

Here, you can report this due to offensive language, spam or advertisements.

 
Was this review helpful? YesNo

2. Too simplistic and wide design!

25 Feb 2009 by steve2

56.7%5.7out of 10

I had Krzr which I broke, so I got VU204. When I opened the box, I really liked the design and soft velvety feel of outcover. But, not to my liking,  the phone is lot wider than Krzr and the number keys buttons are from plastic and looks cheap. Inside there is nothing in it, no music player or external memory, which I knew when I bought it, but I kind of regret it now. Sound quality okay I guess. One thing I like is it has dedicated headphone port which was lacking in Krzr.





Outcover is stylish.
Dedicated headphone port.
Smaller motorola charger (than one with Krzr).
Ok sound quality and reception.
Wider and thick.
Number pads feels like cheap plastic.
No external memory - no music unless you buy from verizon.

Spam report

Here, you can report this due to offensive language, spam or advertisements.

 
Was this review helpful? YesNo

3. no good

8 Dec 2008 by kev

36.7%3.7out of 10

had this phone one week before the inside display went out suddenly - never to come back. so cheaply made you can't even take off the batt cover without damaging it. all around fail. too bad there are no well made basic phones available...not everyone wants all the flash. is there no market for a durable basic phone? jeez.





good basic design
better ui
low grade construction
malfunctioning display

Spam report

Here, you can report this due to offensive language, spam or advertisements.

 
Was this review helpful? YesNo
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

4. Motorola VU204

10 Nov 2008 by Mark_S

86.7%8.7out of 10

Ergonomical from factor, soft touch shell make this phone a pleasure to hold and will not slip easily. Display is crisp. Fonts are small which Motorola is infamous for. The only setting that a user can adjust the fonts is for dialing numbers. Choose large fonts of course. Vibe is quite strong. Ringtones are pretty generic Motorolas including Verizon Wireless basic tones. Reception is very good. Battery-life has yet to be determined. Turn the display brightness down to 1. That should help. This is a CDMA phone so do not expect "uber" battery-life unless you purchase an extended life battery with over 1000ma. Otherwise not a bad phone for the affordability and performance





Ergonomical, soft-touch shell(not a fingerprint magnet), reception.
Small fonts, somewhat cramped outer display

Spam report

Here, you can report this due to offensive language, spam or advertisements.

 
Was this review helpful? YesNo
10 out of 13 people found this review helpful.
Generated for: 0.0227