Average User Rating

Design: 7.4; 74.11765%
Features: 6.7; 67.05882%

Good

6.8

out of 10

Based on 18 opinions

advertisement:

1. this phone is shit

30 Jan 2006 by this phone is shit

20%2out of 10

i had this phone it aint worth it keep your fucking money and buy a stripper

Spam report
Here, you can report this due to offensive language, spam or advertisements.

Was this review helpful? Yes No

2. Phone isnt worth the space it takes

18 Nov 2005 by James

32%3.2out of 10

The Phone is not worth the investment. It shuts down on its own, loses signals sporadically, and causes way too many headaches. I dont want to financially support the makers of Excedrin, but with this phone I might as well have. Signals are dropped on a whim, stanidng still in the same spot, you will go from a full signal with your provider to a complete loss of one and go onto emergency only or no signal. (This was confirmed by my being with two other people with the same CPSP and they had a full signal on different phones.) I dropped the phone ONCE ... and when it fell, the top portion of the phone fell off. I have yet to see a phone that will fall apart from ONE fall.

Spam report
Here, you can report this due to offensive language, spam or advertisements.

Was this review helpful? Yes No

3. Moto V220

14 Oct 2005 by Eye in the LA sky

74%7.4out of 10

Have had my V220 for almost a year. The camera is REALLY basic & has minimal contrast control. NOT good for action shots (capture rate is SLOW).

I'm on Cingular in SoCal. I love Cingular. However, sometimes when i send a txt msg, phone tells me 'can't send now, try later', even though it's showing 3,4 or sometimes 5 bars for signal!! (kinda frustrating).

Haven't had the patience for using the browser feature. It's slow too.

Next time think i'll try either Samsung or maybe go back to Nokia.

Spam report
Here, you can report this due to offensive language, spam or advertisements.

Was this review helpful? Yes No

4. motorola v220

10 Sep 2005 by razzah ali

82%8.2out of 10

The motorola v220 is good value for money however, if you are looking for a slightly expensiver,(much better) phone go for the sony ericsson k770i. The k700 i has a mp3 player built in but with 41 gb internal memory much better than the v220 and its features are amazing and takes the limits of a mobile phone to the extreme.

Spam report
Here, you can report this due to offensive language, spam or advertisements.

Was this review helpful? Yes No

5. not bad really

26 Aug 2005 by ch33tah

76%7.6out of 10

i've had this phone for abt 8 months. sound could be a bit louder, the camera works great outside, but def. not for indoor dark areas (like in the club for example). The only thing that bothers me with this phone is the software crashes now and then.. esp when i'm using AOL instant messenger on it. usually happens when I'm scrolling to read the messages while someone has msg'd me. i didnt shell out heaps of money for this phone, so i'm happy all around. I made my own mp3 ringtones by using soundforge and the pc tools software to upload them onto my phone. I also really LOVE the iTap Predictive Text Input ... makes for txting really reallly easy. yeah the phone does scratch easily, and i've got a really bad habit of just dropping it into my purse when I'm on the run... but oh well!

Spam report
Here, you can report this due to offensive language, spam or advertisements.

Was this review helpful? Yes No

6. Dont waste your Money

20 Jul 2005 by Matt

46%4.6out of 10

This phone is horrible, the reception is bad, the camera broke after 2 months (is wasnt that good before that), the only good thing is the speaker phone option, other than that it stinks. The ring tones and volume change on there own. This phone is horrible I would not reccomend this to anyone unless you were not planning on keeping it for longer than 2 months.

Spam report
Here, you can report this due to offensive language, spam or advertisements.

Was this review helpful? Yes No

7. need to know the price

5 Jul 2005 by awesome

60%6out of 10

how can i purchase the phone if i dont know what i am getting my self into so send me the price and the specific of how i will be billed!oyea what about the go phones?

Spam report
Here, you can report this due to offensive language, spam or advertisements.

Was this review helpful? Yes No

8. Very bad reception

3 Jul 2005 by kingsbridge77

44%4.4out of 10

Doesn't work in my building. It does work in my workplace, which is a building too, located in Manhattan. So it seems to be a Bronx thing.
Still, it SHOULD work in my building. I have to stick my head out the window to talk.
Sound is choppy. Camera phone yields bad pictures. I don't recommend this phone.

Spam report
Here, you can report this due to offensive language, spam or advertisements.

Was this review helpful? Yes No

9. Sucks

1 May 2005 by Kathy

68%6.8out of 10

This phone is a major issue. Is camera sucks so bad its so dark no matter how you try to adjust it. It scratches easily. The phone (if you are strong enough) you could crush it with your bare hands. I hate it so much. But its desighn is aiight. Feature are ok but they only have one game the ring tones suck. The sound is ok and the speaker is OK. The price is a rip off it sshould be like $40.00. After that the phone is just a phone.

Spam report
Here, you can report this due to offensive language, spam or advertisements.

Was this review helpful? Yes No

10. pretty good phone

21 Mar 2005 by hostile13

78%7.8out of 10

well these a pretty good phone everything is good except the camera ive had it for almost 6 months n its been perfect except the camera is horrible they should hav givin it a WAY beta camera otha then that its a great phone for teenagers like myself and ppl who stay home and have alot of friends and talk on the phone alot but definitly not for photo freaks!!! ne wayz im out lata

Spam report
Here, you can report this due to offensive language, spam or advertisements.

Was this review helpful? Yes No