To answer both...the original RAZR was (and is) one of the most durable phones I have ever owned (and read millions upon millions of such testimonials online, too). The RAZR2, also very very durable. The only "weak" phones I've ever had are Samsung and Sony Ericsson (though SE's OS is my very favorite).
As to Moto's OS...the new MOTOMAGX (RAZR2 V8, RIZR, ROKR, etc) is WONDERFUL...and, the updated Synergy used on the RAZR2 V9 is FAR more customizable, and one of the fastest you'll ever see.
You guys need to get to up to date on your cell facts...
0
4.
pmm122 @ 29 May, 2008 01:46:26 PM
i hope ur talking about the razr for tmo or att cuz for cdma they suck just like u >_< i would never in my life buy another a moto phone. i am sticking with HTC for LIFE!!
Razr is a good phone? Thats odd considering all the broken and glichy ones I still see at my store. The only phone worse is the Krazer and its probably on the same level of horrible as the original chocolate...... I hope moto pulls themselves up with the new models because anyone that works in a store can tell you how poor they are compared to other makers. I do like the moto 755...
Hey pmm122 I think YOU need to get up to date on your facts. I work for Verizon and trust me, Motorola is at the BOTTOM of the list. They are returned to my store ALL the time. If you actually worked with different cell phone models daily like I do, you would see how crappy they really are. So next time before you go posting on how good a phone is maybe YOU need to check out your facts.
Replyto this commentThis comment is posted in response to #9 ( Show )
0
20.
Donato @ 03 June, 2008 10:46:55 PM
Nikki,
As someone who is familiar with Verizon phones, which one do you think is the best for call quality and reception? I am soon turning in my old LG VX8350 clam for a new phone and I am confused by all the choices. I like the LG enV2 design but I do not do much text messaging. The new LG VX8610 looks promising. Are all Motorola phones poor in your opinion? How about the z6c or this new V750? I prefer not to purchase a touch screen phone because of the "issues" I have read about them. Otherwise, the Venus might be perfect. Thanks for your time and input. I think you can help out many of us with your reply.
Replyto this commentThis comment is posted in response to #13 ( Show )
I like the idea of a ruggedized phone, but most of the manufacturing plants I work in will not allow cameras of any kind in the plant. If they are trying for the business market, I think they miss the point by not having a cameraless option. Also certification for Class I, Div I areas, but thats another issue.
0
15.
anonymous @ 02 June, 2008 09:22:20 AM
the current G'z one can be ordered for customers in a non-camera version and that thing can take a beating
material needed:
1 - gun
1 - bullet
1 - phone
1 - phone holder
take da bullet nd put it n da gun, put da phone n da holder nd put da gun up to da phone nd pull da trigger.
if da phone is still in-tact den obviously u missed the phone nd wasted a bullet!!! either dat or da phone is bullet proof!
if da phone is n peices den obviously u dropped it before it made it 2 da phone holder (butterfingers!!!!)
stay tuned! next time we'll test how durrable a gun is against a steam roller! lolz
0
22.
dirty Harry @ 09 June, 2008 10:53:58 PM
That is all Verizon wireless phones are good for target prastice
User comments
Post comment