Hands-on with the Verizon Wireless XV6900

Hands-on with the Verizon Wireless XV6900

News icon

Published on: 19 April, 2008 by PhoneArena Team

Hands-on with the Verizon Wireless XV6900

Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.
Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.
A few days ago, Verizon Wireless released the XV6900 and PhoneArena has gotten some quality time with the device. The XV6900 is the same device as the Touch, which Sprint and Alltel has carried since last year, but has gotten a white makeover for Verizon. Early rumors said that the device was slimmer, and Verizon themselves originally said it would launch with GPS and EVDO Rev. A, but none of those turned out to be true. Save for a few software customizations and the whitewash the XV6900 and Touch are identical devices. HTC’s TouchFLO interface and the phone’s size is still the key differentiation between other smartphone on the market. It should also be noted that the XV6900 does not offer any of Verizon’s multimedia services, unlike the Sprint Touch.

The white plastic of the XV6900 creates a significant difference from the Sprint Touch, however. Whereas Sprint’s black version uses soft touch paint, giving a reassuring feeling in the hand, the white plastic casing used by Verizon is hard and slippery, making the device feel decidedly cheap. The white mesh for the speaker holes, as well a lack of branding on the back, give the XV6900 the appearance of a knock-off Chinese device as opposed to a $350 smartphone. Though we would have imagined it was the same, the Verizon screen has noticeably more drag when running a finger or stylus across the screen. We’ll give Verizon the benefit of the doubt and chalk that up to months of use on our Sprint device, but honestly we don’t remember that with the Touch. It ships with a few less accessories as well: there is no miniUSB to 2 miniUSB splitter, no stereo headphones and no memory card which are all included with the Sprint Touch.
advertisment:


However, in comparison to the LG Voyager, the XV6900's display is somewhat more responsive and is easier to use with your finger. Often times when we used the Voyager, we wished a stylus was included, but we hardly ever needed to use the one that came with the XV6900. The included mobile version of Internet Explorer loaded web sites faster and displayed them with greater ease than the Voyager's basic HTML browser. Not to mention that Mobile Outlook is a more capable e-mail program, with the ability to view HTML e-mails and open file attachments.

We should also point out that the new $29.99 Data Plan that Verizon launched on April 14th is currently not available with the XV6900. This leaves consumers with the following four choices:

  1. Pay-as-you-go, which will charge you $15.36 per MB (1.5 cents per KB).
  2. 10MB of data usage for $24.99/month, with overages costing $5.12 per MB (1/2 cent per KB).
  3. Unlimited data (5GB cap) for $44.99/month.
  4. Data Block, which will block all incoming and outgoing data.


Overall, we were disappointed in Verizon’s offering when placed next to the Sprint's version. We still love the hardware, build quality and size, just like we did back when reviewing the Sprint unit, but it has taken Verizon over five months to launch a device that was ultimately the same as the competition and in the process they managed to cheapen it. Except, of course, for the price.


HTC Touch CDMA Specifications | Review

Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.



Email this article to a friend









Subscribe

If you'd like to stay informed about news and reviews we have published, related to the following categories, please select the ones of interest to you and enter your e-mail.





 
 
 
 
 

Comments icon User comments

User comments

Show only comments with rating Display mode
0
1.
Thought it was the xv6900 not 69000
Reply to this comment
0
2.
Your right it is the vx6900
0
88.
vx6900 is only for verizon
Reply to this comment
Reply to Nino Hide 1 replies to this comment
0
3.
Yeah, this was a big disappointment for me. I work in a store and was able to crack this phone open a few days ago. The phone definitely feels cheap, the UI alterations are slightly frustrating, and the lack of Wi-Fi is extremely moronic. All in all I think they could have done a better job with this offering, especially in the multimedia area. Nice try, but I'll wait until the next offering to dive into a new phone
Reply to this comment
0
4.
Lack of WiFi
If you want to criticize the phone for no WiFi (it's pointless to have with allll the EV-DO coverage, but whatever) that's fine, but make sure you blame the right party. VZW did not take WiFi off (Sprint's version doesn't have it either), HTC did not make this version with WiFi.
Reply to this comment
0
5.
how does this version cost more than the sprint version??
Reply to this comment
0
6.
B/c it is Verizon
Reply to this comment
0
7.
Crap
No GPS, are you joking? The phone is useless. Verizon You need to get it together!!!
Reply to this comment
0
8.
WHAT A DISAPPOINTMENT!!!!
Reply to this comment
0
9.
GPS
A crappy omission, I agree but that makes this useless? Uhh if it can still CALL people, let alone text, email, and surf then it is FAR from useless.
Reply to this comment
0
10.
Lag?
I played with a live VZW version of this phone and I didn't notice any lag at all, something is up with phonearena's test unit it seems.
Reply to this comment
  Total: 91 post(s)
Post comment

Post comment

Want to comment? Please register or login using the form below. (Forgot password?)
Latest Reviews reviews icon Latest Reviews

Latest Reviews

view all
Most Popular Articles news icon Most Popular Articles

Most Popular Articles

view all
Generated for: 0.0435