• Home
  • Reviews
  • GSM Cameraphone Comparison Q2 2007
Reviews icon GSM Cameraphone Comparison Q2 2007

GSM Cameraphone Comparison Q2 2007

5 megapixels vs 3 megapixels: D900, K800, KG920, N93i, N95

5 megapixels vs 3 megapixels: D900, K800, KG920, N93i, N95

Published on: 11 May, 2007 by PhoneArena Team

Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.
100% Crop
Test 3: Pictures at artificial light: different power, different distances

When you are indoors, in the dark, the flash saves the day. You’ll use the flash in a dark room, in the bar, in the disco or in darker environment, anywhere where there is no powerful lighting.

The result of the previous test has been repeated in this one as well! K800’s Xenon flash beat the competition in the dark rooms, 8-9 ft (3 m) category. It produces abundant light, lighting the objects and producing the most detail in the pictures. In close-ups the N95’s LED does a good job and, combined with the good software, takes the phone to second position in this test. Although equipped with a Xenon-like flash, KG920 is much worse than К800, but still wins the bronze medal. D900 and N93i are almost on a par, but N93i is a little worse off.

Cameraphone comparison samples. Scroll below for our category rating.

We've shooted from 3 distances:
1) 1-3 row: 1.5meters / 4.9feet         2) 4-7 row: 2.5meters / 8.2feet         3) 8-9 row: 3.5meters / 11.5feet

The photos from the first distance are in 3 different lightning conditions. From the second distance, we've shooted in 4 lightning conditions, and in the third distance (the largest) we've shooted in 2 lightning conditions.

Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.
D900K800KG920N93iN95SD630
Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.
Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.
Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.
D900K800KG920N93iN95SD630
Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.
Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.
Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.
Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.
Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.Click to see a large image.
D900K800KG920N93iN95SD630


The phones' performance, sorted from 1st to 5th place:
Click to see a large image.

1) К800: the powerful flash provides the best lighting from different distances, but the enhanced sensitivity results in blurred detail .
2) N95: at close-ups the LED flash lights the objects and the pictures turn out fine, but it is helpless at greater distances.
3) КG920: Although it is not a LED flash, it does not perform as good as that of К800. Just like in the case of night pictures, the noise is easy to see.
4) D900: this phone cannot take picture in the dark. It is almost unusable with its weak LED.
5) N93i: surprisingly, there’s a phone that performs even worse that D900.

Email this review to a friend









Subscribe

If you'd like to stay informed about news and reviews we have published, related to the following categories, please select the ones of interest to you and enter your e-mail.





 
 
 
 
 

Generated for: 0.0486