looks like a cool phone but why would it be only 1.3 megpixel? my voyager is 2 and the dare is 3.2 and so is the storm...why would they make the camera resolution so low?
0
10.
Jyakotu @ 11 November, 2008 09:12:38 PM
I'm guessing so it could be $99? And it doesn't matter how many megapixels a camera phone has. All it means is that you get to take bigger pictures.
3.2 has a lot better quality!!!! still 1.3 megapixels is in the past...the orange and green colors look gay
Replyto this commentThis comment is posted in response to #10 ( Show )
0
17.
anonymous @ 12 November, 2008 03:26:50 PM
The quality is the same until you blow it up
Replyto this commentThis comment is posted in response to #13 ( Show )
0
19.
vzw fanboy @ 12 November, 2008 05:44:03 PM
yea and how big do you mean? if i send a 640X480 pic with a 1.3 mega camera and my voyager 2 mega to my email there is a 900000 percent difference. of course on a little screen there is no difference between the two but if you send it to ur comp there is a huge difference!!! still 1.3 megapixels is in the past!!!
Replyto this commentThis comment is posted in response to #17 ( Show )
0
23.
Jyakotu @ 12 November, 2008 09:20:04 PM
Okay, it's not a big deal. Seriously. Do you know that there are actually some phones that still have a simple VGA camera? Anyway, how many megapixels do you really need on a phone? As long as it can take pictures and you can tell what the picture is, how many megapixels it is doesn't really matter.
ok then why is the iphone 2 megapixels or the dare 3 if it doesnt matter?
Replyto this commentThis comment is posted in response to #23 ( Show )
0
26.
Jyakotu @ 13 November, 2008 09:05:32 AM
I don't know, ask Apple or LG! The point of having a camera on a phone is just for quick snapshots (well, at least...that's what I think). It's just that people are now so used to having 2, 3.2, 5, or 8 MP camera phones, they just shun VGA or 1.3 MP camera phones. But like I said, it depends on the customer that buys the phone. And for me, I don't really need a phone with a high megapixel camera, but it's just a nice addition IMO.
Replyto this commentThis comment is posted in response to #24 ( Show )
Does it matter? All the major carriers have at least ONE phone that other carriers don't have.
Replyto this commentThis comment is posted in response to #11 ( Show )
0
14.
vzw fanboy @ 12 November, 2008 12:50:26 PM
verizon has more trendy phones than at&t!!!! like the env2, voyager and dare.
Replyto this commentThis comment is posted in response to #12 ( Show )
0
25.
Jyakotu @ 13 November, 2008 09:03:03 AM
AT&T, remember, usually keeps business people in mind, but always tries to have phones that regular consumers would like as well. AT&T and Verizon cater to different demographics.
Replyto this commentThis comment is posted in response to #14 ( Show )
0
27.
vzw fanboy @ 13 November, 2008 04:53:47 PM
lol what does that word mean?
Replyto this commentThis comment is posted in response to #25 ( Show )
0
28.
Jyakotu @ 13 November, 2008 10:18:26 PM
A demographic means a target audience.
Replyto this commentThis comment is posted in response to #27 ( Show )
I've been waiting for a decent texting phone from at&t for a while now.
I'm not fond of and Blackberrys or that Samsung propel.
I've got my mind set on this or the HTC Touch Pro.
They both seem sturday and sufficient for needs.
Can't wait to get my hands on one or the other.
Pound for pound, Sprint has the best line up of phones around. ATT and VZW kill their phones by having inferior GUIs and taking out huge chunks of memory from their phones.
Long live the Yellow and Black!
0
20.
vzw fanboy @ 12 November, 2008 05:46:14 PM
i like that all vz dumb phones have the same ui its soooo easy to navigate thru the menus and stuff.
User comments
Post comment